Affiliations: [a] Centre for Vision Research, York University, Toronto, Canada | [b] Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Canada | [c] Department of Computer Science, York University, Toronto, Canada
Correspondence:
[*]
Corresponding author: Philip Jaekl, Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3J 1P3. Tel.: +1 416 736 2100 x 40886; Fax: +1 416 736 5857; E-mail: jaekl@yorku.ca
Abstract: We measured how much the visual world could be moved during various head rotations and translations and still be perceived as visually stable. Using this as a monitor of how well subjects know about their own movement, we compared performance in different directions relative to gravity. For head rotations, we compared the range of visual motion judged compatible with a stable environment while rotating around an axis orthogonal to gravity (where rotation created a rotating gravity vector across the otolith macula), with judgements made when rotation was around an earth-vertical axis. For translations, we compared the corresponding range of visual motion when translation was parallel to gravity (when imposed accelerations added to or subtracted from gravity), with translations orthogonal to gravity. Ten subjects wore a head-mounted display and made active head movements at 0.5 Hz that were monitored by a low-latency mechanical tracker. Subjects adjusted the ratio between head and image motion until the display appeared perceptually stable. For neither rotation nor translation were there any differences in judgements of perceptual stability that depended on the direction of the movement with respect to the direction of gravity.
