Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Johnson-Kerner, Bethany L.a; * | Colao, Kathleena | Evanson, Nathan K.b; c | Taylor, J. Michaelb; d
Affiliations: [a] Department of Neurology and Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA | [b] Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA | [c] Division of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA | [d] Division of Neurology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Bethany L. Johnson-Kerner, MD PhD, Assistant Professor, UCSF Neurology and Pediatrics, Mission Hall Global Health and Clinical Sciences Building, 550 16th Street, 4th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA. Tel.: +1 4153533939; Fax: +1 4153532400; E-mail: ccbethany.kerner@ucsf.edu.
Abstract: PURPOSE:More than 50,000 children are hospitalized yearly in the U.S. for acquired brain injury (ABI) with no established standards or protocols for school re-entry and limited resources for hospital-school communication. While ultimately the school has autonomy over curricula and services, specialty physicians were asked about their participation and perception of barriers in the school re-entry process. METHODS:Approximately 545 specialty physicians were sent an electronic survey. RESULTS:84 responses (43% neurologists and 37% physiatrists) were obtained with a response rate of ∼15%. Thirty-five percent reported that specialty clinicians currently make the plan for school re-entry. The biggest challenge for school re-entry noted by physicians was cognitive difficulties (63%). The biggest gaps perceived by physicians were a lack of hospital-school liaisons to help design and implement a school re-entry plan (27%), schools’ inability to implement a school re-entry plan (26%), and an evidence-based cognitive rehab curriculum (26%). Forty-seven percent of physicians reported that they did not have adequate medical personnel to support school re-entry. The most commonly used outcome measure was family satisfaction. Ideal outcome measures included satisfaction (33%) and formal assessment of quality of life (26%). CONCLUSION:These data suggest that specialty physicians identify a lack of school liaisons in the medical setting as an important gap in hospital-school communication. Satisfaction and formal assessment of quality of life are meaningful outcomes for this provider group.
Keywords: Traumatic brain injury, acquired brain injury, school re-entry, cognitive rehabilitation, access to care
DOI: 10.3233/PRM-210130
Journal: Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 497-505, 2023
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl