Pediatric unilateral spatial neglect: A systematic review

Article type: Research Article

Authors: Hart, Emerson^{a; *} | Grattan, Emily^{b; c} | Woodbury, Michelle^{a; d} | Herbert, Teri Lynn^e | Coker-Bolt, Patty^d | Bonilha, Heather^a

Affiliations: [a] Department of Health Science and Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA | [b] Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA | [c] VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA | [d] Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA | [e] Medical University of South Carolina Academic Affairs, Charleston, SC, USA

Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Emerson Hart, Department of Health Science and Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, 77 President St, Charleston, SC 29425, USA. Tel.: +1 8437923477; E-mail: hartem@musc.edu.

Abstract: PURPOSE:Unilateral spatial neglect (USN), an inability to attend to one side of space or one’s body, is commonly reported in adult stroke survivors and is associated with poor outcomes. USN has been reported in pediatric survivors of stroke, but its impact is unclear. The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize and evaluate the literature regarding USN in pediatric stroke survivors. METHODS:PRISMA guidelines, Scopus, CINAHL, PubMed, and other relevant databases were searched with terms including “children”, “stroke”, and “unilateral neglect”, with the ages of participants limited from to birth to 18 years. Data were extracted from studies on the clinical presentation of pediatric USN, the assessment of this condition, treatment options, or USN recovery. RESULTS:A total of 18 articles met inclusion criteria. There were no current prevalence data available. USN presents similarly in children compared to adults. Several different USN assessments were used, however, there were little data regarding treatment options. Furthermore, the data suggest that not all children fully recover. CONCLUSION:This systematic review reveals a lack of quality research to inform the assessment and treatment of children with USN. Although the literature spans decades, there remain no guidelines for standardized assessment or treatment. Similar to adults, paper-and-pencil testing may be less able to identify USN than functional assessments. It is likely that there are children who struggle with undetected USN-related deficits years after their injuries. With a rise of pediatric stroke survivors, there is a pressing need for clinicians to be educated about USN in children, clinical presentations, assessments, and treatments.

Keywords: Stroke (MeSH), neglect, pediatrics (MeSH), perceptual disorders (MeSH)

DOI: 10.3233/PRM-200779

Journal: Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 345-359, 2021