You are viewing a javascript disabled version of the site. Please enable Javascript for this site to function properly.
Go to headerGo to navigationGo to searchGo to contentsGo to footer
In content section. Select this link to jump to navigation

Caffeine in bronchiolitis associated apnea: A retrospective cohort study

Article type: Other

Authors: Duffett, Mark; | Liu, Daisy M. | Deshpande, Ashish | Choong, Karen

Affiliations: Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada | Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada

Note: [] Corresponding author: Dr. Mark Duffett, McMaster Children's Hospital, MUMC 1E1A 1200 Main St West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4J9, Canada. Tel.: +1 905 521 5008 x75216; Fax: +1 905 521 5008; E-mail: duffetmc@mcmaster.ca.

Keywords: Bronchiolitis, apnea, caffeine, respiratory syncytial virus, mechanical ventilation, critical care

DOI: 10.3233/PIC-2012-016

Journal: Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 95-98, 2012

Received 27 July 2010
|
Revision received 18 January 2011
|
Accepted 6 February 2011
|
Published: 2012
Get PDF

Abstract

Young infants with bronchiolitis commonly present with apnea. Caffeine is effective in treating apnea of prematurity and has been used to treat apnea associated with bronchiolitis.

To evaluate whether caffeine administration to infants presenting with apnea in the setting of bronchiolitis was associated with a decreased rate of endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation, compared to infants who did not receive caffeine. Retrospective cohort study.

University affiliated tertiary care children's hospital. Twenty-eight infants less than 3 months of age, 13 of whom received caffeine. Fewer infants who received caffeine required endotracheal intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation (OR = 0.30 95% CI 0.07 to 1.4, p = 0.15), but this was not statistically significant. Infants who received caffeine were more likely to be treated with non-invasive ventilation than infants in the control group (OR = 14; 95% CI 2.1 to 98 p = 0.01). Only one patient who was initially managed with non-invasive ventilation was subsequently intubated. There was no difference in the duration of total respiratory support, duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, hospital and pediatric critical care unit stay. All infants survived. This study does not provide adequate evidence to support or refute the routine use of caffeine in bronchiolitis associated apnea.