Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Khedr, Eman M.a; b; * | Al-Fawal, Bastawyb | Abdel Wraith, Ahmedb | Saber, Mostafab | Hasan, Asmaa M.a | Bassiony, Ahmedc | Nasr Eldein, Ahmeda | Rothwell, John C.d
Affiliations: [a] Department of Neuropsychiatry, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, Egypt | [b] Department of Neuropsychiatry, Aswan University Hospital, Aswan, Egypt | [c] Department of Neuropsychiatry, Ain Shams University Hospital, Cairo, Egypt | [d] Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Prof. Dr. Eman M. Khedr, Department of Neuropsychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, Egypt. Tel.: +02 01005850632; Fax: +02 088 2333327; E-mail: emankhedr99@yahoo.com.
Abstract: Background:There is evidence that both high and low frequency rTMS may have therapeutic effects on motor performance of Parkinson’s disease. Objective:The aim of the study was to conduct the first direct comparison of the two approaches. Methods:52 PD patients were randomly classified into two groups. The first group received 20 Hz and the 2nd group received 1 Hz rTMS with a total of 2000 pulses over M1of each hemisphere for ten days. Effects were assessed with the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale part III (UPDRS), Instrumental Activity of Daily Living (IADL), and a self-assessment score (SA) before, after the last session, and one month later. Cortical excitability was measured before and after the end of sessions. Results:There was a significant improvement on all rating scales after either 1 Hz or 20 Hz rTMS, but the effect persisted for longer after 20 Hz (treatment X time interaction for UPDRS and IADL (P = 0.075 and 0.04, respectively). Neither treatment affected motor thresholds, but 20 Hz rTMS increased MEP amplitude and the duration of transcallosal inhibition. In an exploratory analysis, each group was subdivided into akinetic-rigid and tremor dominant subgroups and the effects of 1 Hz and 20 Hz treatment recalculated. There was weak evidence that patients with an akinetic-rigid presentation may respond better than those with predominant tremor. Conclusion:Both 20 Hz and 1 Hz rTMS improve motor function in PD, but 20 Hz rTMS is more effective.
Keywords: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03342846
DOI: 10.3233/JPD-181540
Journal: Journal of Parkinson's Disease, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 379-387, 2019
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl