Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Taran, YU.V. | Daymond, M.R. | Schreiber, J.
Affiliations: Frank Laboratory of Neutron Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna, Moscow, Russian Federation | ISIS Facility, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon OX11 0QX, UK | EADQ, Fraunhofer Institute for Nondestructive Testing, D-01326 Dresden, Germany
Note: [] Corresponding author. Fax: +7-09621-65-882. E-mail: taran@nf.jinr.ru
Abstract: The problem of converting of the phase lattice parameters determined by the time-of-flight neutron diffraction measurements in a loaded multiphase system, to strain and subsequently to stress is discussed. An analytical formulation relating the phase applied stress–elastic strain responses in the axial (along the load direction) and transverse directions has been performed which accounts for all the sources of stress measured in the phases. The formulation was applied in the analysis of diffraction spectra from austenitic stainless steel with a martensite phase plastically induced during cyclic tensile-compressive loading. The spectra were obtained during in situ neutron diffraction stress rig experiments on the ENGIN instrument at the ISIS pulsed neutron facility, subsequent to the cyclic loading. The subsequent applied stress–elastic strain responses of the austenitic matrix and martensitic inclusions were obtained by Rietveld refinement of the spectra, and used to determine the elastic constants and residual stresses of the phases as a function of fatigue level. The data shows that the elastic properties of both phases are similar, which allows the simple determination of residual stresses. Only deviatoric components of the residual stress tensor were obtained due to the lack of an unstressed reference for both individual phases. The formation of martensite is connected with volume dilation; since the specific volume of martensite is larger than that of austenite, the martensite phase is generally in hydrostatic compression, where as the austenite is in tension. These plasticity induced phase transformation stresses are superimposed upon the deformation stresses caused by the plastic deformation occurring during low cycle fatigue, resulting in residual stresses which have a non-hydrostatic nature. We have observed that in the axial direction the deviatoric phase stress of the austenitic phase was compressive while it was tensile for the martensite phase. The axial phase stresses are mainly those due to the deformation, while the phase transformation stresses dominate in the transverse direction.
Keywords: Stress–elastic strain responses, Martensite, Austenite, Rietveld refinement
DOI: 10.1080/10238160410001734658
Journal: Journal of Neutron Research, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 255-261, 2003
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl