Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Cordero, Leandro | Nankervis, Craig A. | Coley, Brian D. | Giannone, Peter J.
Affiliations: Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA | Department of Radiology, Nationwide Childrens Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
Note: [] Corresponding author: Leandro Cordero, MD, Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, N118 Doan Hall, 410 W. 10th Avenue, Columbus, Ohio 43210-1228, USA. Tel.: +1 614 293 8660; Fax: +1 614 293 7676; E-mail: Leandro.cordero@osumc.edu
Abstract: Background: Traditionally, orogastric tube (OGt) length of insertion is determined by nose-earlobe-xyphoid (NEX) measurement. Although radiography is the gold standard for verification of placement, scarce data are available for extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants. Objective: To correlate OGt placement in ELBW infants with its position in the gastrointestinal tract by radiography and to establish clinical correlates with gastrointestinal perforations. Design/methods: Retrospective evaluation of 290 ELBW infants. The 1st (n=290) and 2nd (n=273) radiographs following OGt placement were evaluated. Diaphragm and OGt were referenced to the level of the 10{th} thoracic vertebra (T10). The lower esophageal sphincter (LES) was presumed to be at T9. Results: Most (86%) OGt were placed during the first three days of life. OGt pores and the stomach were visible in 37% and 40% of the cases respectively. The diaphragm was noted to be at T8 (14%), T9 (43%), T10 (41%) & T11 (2%). On the first radiograph, OGt were in the esophagus (4%), in the duodenum (3%), straight in the stomach (8%) and diagonal in the stomach (85%). Of all 563 radiographs evaluated, 502 (89%) OGt were diagonal in the stomach, extending below the LES for a median 3 cm (0.7–4.9 cm). In the 225 radiographs where the stomach could be visualized, the median distance from T10 to the OGt tip was 2.8 cm (1–5) while that from T10 to the greater curvature was 3.1 cm (1–5). Clinical correlates: There were 21 cases of necrotizing enterocolitis (15 of them with perforation) and 7 cases of spontaneous intestinal perforation. None of them were temporally or anatomically linked to OGt placement. Conclusions: Radiological verification of OGt placement is possible. The unpredictable level of the diaphragm, the poor visibility of OGt pores and the often gasless stomach can make radiological verification difficult. Determining OGt insertion length in ELBW infants by the NEX method results in appropriate intragastric placement in 85% of the cases.
DOI: 10.3233/NPM-2009-0078
Journal: Journal of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 253-259, 2009
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl