Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Jain, Archikaa; * | Sharma, Sandhyab
Affiliations: [a] Department of CSE, Suresh Gyan Vihar University, Jaipur, India | [b] Department of ECE, Suresh Gyan Vihar University, Jaipur, India
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author. Archika Jain, Research Scholar, Department of CSE, Suresh Gyan Vihar University, Jaipur, India. Tel.: +91 7597161891; E-mail: archikaagarwal@gmail.com.
Abstract: Hate speech on social media post is running now a days. Social media like YouTube, Twitter, and Facebook etc. are responsible for hated speech. Hated speech spreads through digital media, causing individuals to get confused and adopt prejudiced viewpoints. To limit the negative effects of disinformation on the digital platform, it is critical to detect it. Now a days, lots of digital platforms are available. Hate speech detection in dataset is very difficult. As a result, the Twitter dataset is of the size of 25296 is presented in this work. Many deep learning techniques are applied on Twitter dataset. The Google Colab tool is used to scrape dataset material. Different deep learning approaches are utilized to boost the accuracy of the hated speech dataset. For training and validation accuracy and loss some models are used on Twitter dataset like Bi-directional Long Short Term Memory with Glove, Bi-LSTM, and Embedding from Language Model (Elmo) with deep learning, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Long Short Term Memory with Glove and LSTM. The performance of the proposed tweet dataset is evaluated using a variety of deep learning classifiers on text dataset. The planned deep learning techniques produced good results on tweet dataset. LSTM with Glove gave the highest accuracy 0.89 and minimum loss 0.19 on tweet dataset. So when compare our model on same dataset that was used earlier then we get highest accuracy and minimum loss.
Keywords: Deep learning, classifiers, twitter dataset, LSTM, and accuracy
DOI: 10.3233/JIFS-222431
Journal: Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 8329-8341, 2023
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl