Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Alothman, Zainaba | Alkasassbeh, Mouhammda; * | Al-Haj Baddar, Sherenaza; b
Affiliations: [a] Princess Summaya University for Technology, Amman, Jordan | [b] The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan. E-mails: zai20178091@psut.edu.jo, m.alkasassbeh@psut.edu.jo, s.baddar@ju.edu.jo
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author. E-mail: m.alkasassbeh@psut.edu.jo.
Abstract: The numerous security loopholes in the design and implementation of many IoT devices have rendered them an easy target for botnet attacks. Several approaches to implement behavioral IoT botnet attacks detection have been explored, including machine learning. The main goal of previous studies was to achieve the highest possible accuracy in distinguishing normal from malicious IoT traffic, with minimal regard to the identification of the particular type of attack that is being launched. In this study, we present a machine learning based approach for detecting IoT botnet attacks that not only helps distinguish normal from malicious traffic, but also detects the type of the IoT botnet attack. To achieve this goal, the Bot-IoT dataset, in which instances have main attack and sub-attack categories, was utilized after performing the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE), among other preprocessing techniques. Moreover, multiple classifiers were tested and the results from the best three, namely: J48, Random Forest (RF), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) networks were reported. The results showed the superiority of the RF and J48 classifiers compared to the MLP networks and other state-of-the-art solutions. The accuracy of the best binary classifier reported in this study reached 0.999, whereas the best accuracies of main attack and subcategories classifications reached 0.96 and 0.93, respectively. Only few studies address the classification errors in this domain, yet, it was assessed in this study in terms of False Negative (FN) rates. J48 and RF classifiers, here also, outperformed the MLP network classifier, and achieved a maximum micro FN rate for subcategories classification of 0.076.
Keywords: IoT botnets, Intrusion Detection, Bot-IoT dataset, SMOTE, machine learning, malicious IoT traffic
DOI: 10.3233/JHS-200641
Journal: Journal of High Speed Networks, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 241-254, 2020
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl