Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Xiong, Z.a; b | Zang, J.a | Liu, H.J.a | Karaoulanis, D.c | Zhou, Q.b | Bacalis, N.C.d; *
Affiliations: [a] Space Science and Technology Research Institute, Southeast University, Nanjing 21006, Jiangsu, China | [b] School of Economics and Management, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, Jiangsu, China | [c] Korai 21, Halandri, GR-15233, Greece | [d] Theoretical and Physical Chemistry Institute, National Hellenic Research Foundation, Athens, GR-11635, Greece
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: N.C. Bacalis, Theoretical and Physical Chemistry Institute, National Hellenic Research Foundation, Athens, GR-11635, Greece. E-mail:nbacalis@eie.gr
Abstract: We demonstrate that, if a truncated expansion of a wave function is large, then the standard excited states computational method, of optimizing one ``root'' of a secular equation, according to the theorem of Hylleraas, Undheim and McDonald (HUM), tends to the correct excited wave function, comparable to that obtained via our proposed minimization principle for excited states [J. Comput. Meth. Sci. Eng. 8, 277 (2008)] (independent of orthogonality to lower lying approximants). However, if a truncated expansion of a wave function is small - that would be desirable for large systems - then the HUM-based methods may lead to an incorrect wave function - despite the correct energy (: according to the HUM theorem) whereas our method leads to correct, reliable, albeit small truncated wave functions. The demonstration is done in He excited states, using truncated series ``small'' expansions both in Hylleraas coordinates, and via standard configuration-interaction truncated ``small'' expansions, in comparison with corresponding ``large'' expansions. Beyond that, we give some examples of linear combinations of Hamiltonian eigenfunctions that have the energy of the 1st excited state, albeit they are orthogonal to it, demonstrating that the correct energy is not a criterion of correctness of the wave function.
Keywords: Excited states, minimization principle, HUM
DOI: 10.3233/JCM-170722
Journal: Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 347-361, 2017
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl