Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Taswell, Carl1
Note: [1] C. Taswell (ctaswell@toolsmiths.com) is with Computational Toolsmiths, POB 18925, Stanford, CA 94309-8925.
Abstract: Previous simulation experiments for the comparison of wavelet shrinkage denoising methods have failed to demonstrate significant differences between methods. Such differences have never been clearly demonstrated due to the use of qualitative comparisons or of quantitative comparisons that suffered from insufficient sample size and/or absent confidence intervals for the figure of merit investigated. In particular, previous studies have used lion-robust measures as figures of merit for fixed signal classes defined by adding instances of noise to the same instance of the fixed test signal. New simulation experiments are reported here that instead use robust measures for randomized signal classes defined by adding instances of noise to different instances of randomized test signals. Significantly greater variability in the performance of the denoising methods was observed when comparing results obtained with randomized rather than fixed signal classes. However, the use of robust measures does facilitate statistically valid comparisons with respect to this variability. Indeed, the use of non-robust or of non-randomized signal classes can result in misleading inferences from invalid comparisons. Thus, the combined use of both should yield more realistic and meaningful simulation results that better represent the real-world context intended for applied use of the denoising methods.
Keywords: Wavelet-based denoising, wavelet domain thresholding, wavelet shrinkage, noise removal, non-parametric signal estimation, robust measures
DOI: 10.3233/JCM-2001-12-310
Journal: Journal of Computational Methods in Sciences and Engineering, vol. 1, no. 2-3, pp. 315-326, 2001
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl