Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Yang, Yuminga | Zhao, Benb; * | Xue, Youdic | Dai, Weixiangc
Affiliations: [a] Department of Orthopedics, Xuzhou First People’s Hospital, The Affiliated Xuzhou Municipal Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China | [b] Department of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Huaihai Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, The 71st Group Army Hospital of CPLA Army, Xuzhou, China | [c] Department of Orthopedics, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou Clinical School of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Ben Zhao, Department of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Huaihai Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, The 71st Group Army Hospital of CPLA Army, 226 Tongshan Road, Yunlong District, Xuzhou, China. E-mail: zhaobenbook@163.com.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (SOVCF) is frequently complicated by endplatedisc complex (EDC) injury. While percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) can offer rapid analgesia and facilitate early activity, it does not restore vertebral height and may result in intervertebral leakage and untreated EDC injury. OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of percutaneous functional spinal unit cementoplasty (PFSUP) for SOVCF complicated by EDC injury and compare its clinical and imaging outcomes with PKP. METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study. Patients with SOVCF complicated with EDC injury between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019, were recruited and assigned to the PKP group and PFSUP group based on their treatment procedures Back pain was evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) and daily life activities were assessed using the Oswestry disability index (ODI). X-rays were employed to observe the presence and location of cement leakage, as well as to measure the sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and local kyphosis angle (LKA). Loss of correction was calculated by subtracting the LKA after surgery from that at the final follow-up visit Subsequent vertebral fracture (SVF) was confirmed using the Genant semi-quantitative method and/or MRI. RESULTS: A total of 64 patients were included in this study. Among them 41 cases were assigned to the PKP group (28 females, 74.8 years on average), while the remaining 23 cases were assigned to the PFSUP group (15 females, 76.3 years on average). All surgical interventions were successfully completed without major complications. Compared to the PKP group, the PFSUP group had longer operation time (70.28 ± 11.44 vs 44.5 ± 10.12, P< 0.001) higher frequencies of radiation exposure (97.6 ± 19.85 vs 38.6 ± 9.53, P< 0.001), and a lower cement leakage rate (26.1% vs. 41.5%, P< 0.001). One day after surgery and at the final follow-up the PFSUP group had lower VAS and ODI scores, as well as lower LKA and Sva values compared with the PKP group (all P< .001). At the final follow-up visit, the PFSUP group demonstrated a lower loss of correction (4.38 ± 2.71 vs. 10.19 ± 3.41 P< 0.001) and a lower SVF rate compared to the PKP group (21.7% vs. 31.7%, P< 0.001). CONCLUSION: PFSUP outperformed PKP in alleviating pain restoring and maintaining sagittal balance, and lowering the incidence of cement leakage and SVF for SOVCF with EDC injury However, PFSUP was associated with longer operation time and high radiation exposure frequencies.
Keywords: Osteoporosis, spinal fractures, vertebral endplate, bone cement
DOI: 10.3233/BMR-240145
Journal: Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, vol. Pre-press, no. Pre-press, pp. 1-9, 2024
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl