Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Jang, Tae-Jina; b; c | Jeon, In-Cheola; b; c; *
Affiliations: [a] Department of Physical Therapy, College of Life and Health Science, Hoseo University, Asan, Korea | [b] Smart Healthcare Convergence Research Center, Hoseo University, Asan, Korea | [c] Research Institute for Basic Sciences, Hoseo University, Asan, Korea
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: In-Cheol Jeon, Department of Physical Therapy, College of Life and Health Sciences, Hoseo University, Asan, Korea. E-mail: jeon6984@hoseo.edu.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Sedentary work may lead to low back pain. In particular, a slumped sitting position may exacerbate low back pain because of tissue damage caused by excessive lumbar flexion and posterior pelvic tilting. Subjects with low back pain may have excessive changes in the lumbopelvic posture and back muscle activity in the sitting position. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of vibration-based biofeedback using a motion sensor belt and no biofeedback on multifidus (MF) muscle activity and pelvic tilt angle during typing. METHODS: Thirty subjects with low back pain accompanied by hip flexion limitation (15 each in the biofeedback and non-biofeedback groups) were enrolled. Electromyography was used to investigate MF muscle activity before and after typing for 30 min. Pelvic tilt was measured after typing in a sitting position for 30 min. Independent t-tests were used to compare MF muscle activity, and pelvic and second sacrum tilt angles, between the biofeedback and non-biofeedback groups. RESULTS: After typing for 30 min, changes in MF muscle activity (11.45% and -7.19% for the biofeedback and nonbiofeedback groups, respectively) and pelvic and second sacrum tilt angles (3.15∘ and 4.12∘ for the biofeedback group and -11.05∘ and -18.16∘ for the non-biofeedback group, respectively) were significantly smaller in the biofeedback than non-biofeedback group (p< 0.05). CONCLUSION: Vibration-based biofeedback minimizes the reduction in MF muscle activity and changes in pelvic and second sacrum tilt angles during typing in individuals with low back pain accompanied by hip flexion limitation.
Keywords: Biofeedback, multifidus, pelvis, sacrum, typing
DOI: 10.3233/BMR-220284
Journal: Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 67-73, 2024
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl