Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Jeong, Eun-Donga | Kim, Chang-Yongb | Kim, Nack-Hwanc | Kim, Hyeong-Dongd
Affiliations: [a] Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Sciences, Korea University, Seoul, Korea | [b] Pharma and Bio Pharma Industry Team, Department of Pharmaceutical and Bio-Pharmaceutical Industry, Korea Health Industry Development Institute, Cheongju-si, Korea | [c] Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea | [d] Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health and Environmental Science, College of Health Science, Korea University, Seoul, Korea
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Hyeong-Dong Kim, %****␣bmr-35-bmr201840_temp.tex␣Line␣125␣**** Department of Physical Therapy and School of Health and Environmental Science, College of Health Science, Korea University, Hana Science Building B, Korea University, Anam-ro, Seongbuk-Gu, Seoul, 136-701, Korea. Tel.: +82 2 3290 5690; Fax: +82 2 940 2830; E-mail: hdkimx1234@daum.net.
Note: [1] These authors contributed equally to this work.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: The cranio-cervical flexion exercise and sub-occipital muscle inhibition technique have been used to improve a forward head posture among neck pain patients with straight leg raise (SLR) limitation. However, little is known about the cranio-vertebral angle (CVA) and cervical spine range of motion (CROM) after applying stretching methods to the hamstring muscle. OBJECTIVE:To compare the immediate effects of static stretching and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching on SLR, CVA, and CROM in neck pain patients with hamstring tightness. METHODS: 64 subjects were randomly allocated to the static stretching (n1= 32) or proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (n2= 32) stretching group. The SLR test was performed to measure the hamstring muscle’s flexibility and tightness between the two groups, with CROM and CVA also being measured. The paired t-test was used to compare all the variables within each group before and after the intervention. The independent t-test was used to compare the two groups before and after the stretching exercise. RESULTS: There were no between-group effects for any outcome variables (P> 0.05). However, all SLR, CVA, and CROM outcome variables were significantly improved within-group (P< 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There were no between-group effects for any outcome variable; however, SLR, CVA, and CROM significantly improved within-group after the one-session intervention in neck pain patients with hamstring tightness.
Keywords: Hamstring flexibility, neck pain, range of motion, straight leg raise limitation, stretching methods
DOI: 10.3233/BMR-201840
Journal: Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 429-438, 2022
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl