Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Krause, Friedera | Niederer, Daniela; * | Banzer, Winfriedb | Vogt, Lutza
Affiliations: [a] Department of Sports Medicine and Exercise Physiology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Germany | [b] Department of Preventive and Sports Medicine, Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Germany
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Daniel Niederer, Department of Sports Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt Ginnheimer Landstraße 39, 60487 Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Tel.: +49 69 798 245 41; E-mail: niederer@sport.uni-frankfurt.de.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: A considerable part of patients with non-specific low back pain (LBP) suffer from a recurrence of symptoms after therapy cessation. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this cohort study was to evaluate the predictive value of active and passive treatments and treatment modalities on a recurrence of low back pain after cessation of medically prescribed therapy. METHODS: Patients with non-specific LBP from a health- and therapy-center were included. Treatments were monitored and categorized as active or passive. During one year after therapy cessation, patients were monitored to retrieve information about recurrence of symptoms. Patients were dichotomized (recurrence versus no recurrence). An ROC-Analysis was used to determine optimal cut-offs for relevant treatment characteristics’ (passive versus active; frequency) impact on recurrence risk. The relative risk for a recurrence was calculated based on Chi2-test. RESULTS: Data from 96 participants (56 females, 40 males, mean age 49 years, standard deviation 11 years) were analysed. A total of 34 participants had recurring LBP. The frequency of active treatment differed significantly between groups with or without recurrence (p< 0.05). A therapy frequency of 1.45 active treatments/week was a sensitive cut-off (sensitivity: 0.73) to discriminate the recurrence groups. Participants with an active therapy frequency of less than 1.45 treatments per week showed an 82% increased relative recurrence risk (RR: 1.824 (95%-CI: 1.077–3.087)). CONCLUSIONS: The results empathize the importance of active treatments (i.e. exercise) in the therapy and (secondary) prevention of non-specific LBP. Less than 1.45 active treatment sessions/week increases the 1-year-risk of a recurrence by 82%. Performing at least two treatments sessions per week is therefore recommended.
Keywords: Unspecific low back pain, therapy frequency, recurrence-risk, compliance, MiSpEx, NCLBP
DOI: 10.3233/BMR-200149
Journal: Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 665-670, 2021
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl