Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: de Sire, Alessandroa; b; * | Stagno, Davidea | Minetto, Marco Alessandroc | Cisari, Carloa; d | Baricich, Alessioa; d | Invernizzi, Marcoa
Affiliations: [a] Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine, Department of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont “A. Avogadro”, Novara, Italy | [b] Rehabilitation Unit, “Mons. L. Novarese” Hospital, Moncrivello, Vercelli, Italy | [c] Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy | [d] Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, University Hospital “Maggiore della Carità”, Novara, Italy
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Alessandro de Sire, Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine, Department of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont “A. Avogadro”, Viale Piazza D’Armi, 1 – 28100 Novara, Italy. Tel.: +39 3213734800; E-mail: alessandro.desire@gmail.com.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: There is little evidence on intra-articular (IA) treatment in knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and there is a lack of long-term follow-up studies. OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term effectiveness and safety of IA oxygen-ozone (O2O3) and hyaluronic acid (HA) in terms of functioning in KOA patients over a 31-week period. METHODS: Patients aged ⩾ 60 years with KOA were randomly allocated to receive 4 IA knee injections (1/week) of O2O3 or HA (T0–T3) and a follow-up visit 4 weeks after the fourth injection (T4). In this extension study we assessed VAS and safety in patients with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ⩾ 4 at the at 6-month follow-up visit (T5), undergoing a second treatment cycle (T5–T8) and 1-month follow-up visit (T9). RESULTS: Forty-two patients (aged 70.5 ± 5.8 years) were randomly allocated to O2O3 (n= 22) or HA group (n= 20). Twenty-three underwent another IA cycle: 12 (54.6%) in the O2O3 group and 11 (55.0%) in the HA group. Both groups showed significant reduction in VAS (p< 0.013) compared to baseline during both cycles. At follow-up visits (T4 and T9), VAS was significantly lower in the HA group (p< 0.013). There were no differences in adverse events occurrence between groups. CONCLUSIONS: IA O2O3 might be comparable to HA in terms of effectiveness and safety in reducing pain in KOA patients, although at both follow-up visits (T4 and T9) VAS was significantly lower in the HA group.
Keywords: Osteoarthritis, knee, oxygen-ozone therapy, ozone therapy, hyaluronic acid, pain
DOI: 10.3233/BMR-181294
Journal: Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 347-354, 2020
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl