Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Lim, Wootaeka; b
Affiliations: [a] Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health and Welfare, Woosong University, Daejeon, Korea | [b] Advanced Institute of Convergence Sports Rehabilitation, Woosong University, Daejeon, Korea | Tel.: +82 10 9769 1515; Fax: +82 42 630 4611; E-mail: wootaeklimpt@wsu.ac.kr
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health and Welfare, Woosong University, Daejeon, Korea. Tel.: +82 10 9769 1515; Fax: +82 42 630 4611; E-mail: wootaeklimpt@wsu.ac.kr.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Flexibility changes according to stretching intensity have been rarely investigated. I aimed to assess the effect of different stretching intensities on hamstring flexibility by measuring them in a setting similar to real clinical settings. METHODS: Stretching intensities were quantified using an easy method, and participants were grouped according to intensity: 100% (P100), 70% (P70), 40% (P40), and 10% (P10) of maximum voluntary isometric contraction. Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching intensities were measured using a sling system and tension dynamometer. Hamstring flexibility was measured (before; immediately after; and 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 min after stretching) using the active knee extension test. Flexibility was compared between subgroups, and longitudinal changes in flexibility were additionally observed in each group. RESULTS: At identical time points, no significant difference in hamstring flexibility was found between the high-intensity (P100) and moderate-intensity (P70, P40) groups. A significant difference was found between P100 and P10 immediately after and 12 and 15 min after stretching. Increased flexibility was maintained until the end in P100 and P70 but not P40 and P10. CONCLUSIONS: High-intensity and moderate-intensity stretching increases flexibility compared with low-intensity stretching. Furthermore, high-intensity stretching was superior to moderate-intensity stretching in terms of maintaining flexibility over time.
Keywords: Dynamometer, flexibility, intensity, PNF, stretching
DOI: 10.3233/BMR-181243
Journal: Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 579-585, 2019
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl