Affiliations: Shenzhen Second People’s Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
Correspondence:
[*]
Corresponding author: Yang Chen, No 3002. Sungang West Rd., Futian District, Shenzhen 518035, Guangdong, China. E-mail: 275305207@qq.com.
Note: [1] These authors contributed equally to this work.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Retrospective study of 68 patients of symptomatic cervical spondylosis who were treated by anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with single level cervical spondylosis using either zero-profile spacer (group A) or anterior cervical plate and cage (group B). METHODS: Clinical and radiological data of 68 patients undergoing ACDF from C3-C7 were collected retrospectively. There were 35 patients with a mean age of 54.05 years who received treatment by zero-profile implant. A total of 33 patients with a mean age of 52.09 years underwent fusion by traditional plate with cage. Group A and group B were followed up for an average of 23.68 months and 24.39 months, respectively. Age, blood loss, and operation time were assessed. The clinical outcomes were evaluated by JOA and VAS score before and after surgery. In addition, incidence of dysphagia was recorded. The Cobb angle (from C2 to C7) change was measured on the lateral cervical spine radiographs. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in terms of operation time and blood loss between two groups. The postoperative JOA significantly increased and the VAS decreased correspondently in both groups. The postoperative Cobb angle increased and showed statistical difference compared with preoperative Cobb angle in both groups. There was no significant difference between group A and group B in achieving clinical symptoms and radiograph improvement according to postoperative JOA, VAS and Cobb angle comparison. The incidence of postoperative dysphagia was lower in the group A than group B. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the application of zero-p spacer can achieve similar clinical and radiological improvement compared with traditional plate and cage. Meanwhile, zero-p is superior to plate and cage with a lower incidence of postoperative dysphagia.
Keywords: Cervical spine, ACDF, zero-p spacer, plate and cage
