Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Acedo, Adriano Alexandrea | Antunes, Ana Carolina Luduvicea | dos Santos, André Barrosa | de Olveira, Cintia Barbosaa | dos Santos, Claudia Tavaresa | Colonezi, Gustavo Lacreta Toledoa | Fontana, Felipe Antonio Medeirosa | Yukio Fukuda, Thiagob; *
Affiliations: [a] Physical therapist staff, Centro Universitário São Camilo, São Paulo SP, Brazil | [b] Department of Physical Therapy, Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, Centro Universitário São Camilo, São Paulo SP, Brazil
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Thiago Yukio Fukuda, Physical Therapy Department, Avenida Nazaré, 1501, 04263-200, São Paulo SP, Brazil. E-mail: tfukuda10@yahoo.com.br
Abstract: BACKGROUND:Recent studies have shown that a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and interferential current (IFC) application reduces pain in subjects with musculoskeletal disorders. However there are no clinical trials evaluating or comparing the muscle relaxation generated for these devices. PURPOSE:To compare the muscle relaxation of the upper trapezius induced by the application of TENS and IFC in females with chronic nonspecific neck discomfort. METHODS:Sixty-four females between 18 and 40 years of age and a history of nonspecific neck discomfort were randomly assigned to a TENS or an IFC group. The women in the TENS (N=32; mean age 22 years) and IFC (N=32, mean age 23 years) group were submitted to current application during 3 consecutive days and were assessed by electromyography (EMG) in different times aiming to quantify the muscular tension of the upper trapezius. A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used as pain measure at baseline (before TENS or IFC application) and at the end of the study. RESULTS:At baseline, demographic, pain, and EMG assessment data were similar between groups. Those in the IFC group had a significant trapezius relaxation after 3 IFC applications when compared to baseline and intermediate evaluations (P<0.05). In contrast, the same analysis showed no significant difference between all assessments in the TENS group (P>0.05). In relation to pain relief, both groups showed an improvement at the end of the study when compared to baseline (both, P<0.05). The between-group analysis showed no difference for the subjects who received such IFC as TENS application (P<0.05). CONCLUSION:IFC induced the upper trapezius relaxation after 3 sessions in females with neck discomfort, but the TENS application did not change the muscular tension. However, these results should be carefully interpreted due to the lack of differences between groups. A significant pain decrease was found in the subjects of both groups, however, only the IFC application presented a clinically important improvement.
Keywords: Electrical stimulation, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, muscle relaxation, electromyography, neck pain
DOI: 10.3233/BMR-140482
Journal: Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 19-24, 2015
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl