How effective is a modified exercise program on its own or with back school in chronic low back pain? A randomized-controlled clinical trial

Article type: Research Article

Authors: Durmus, Dilek^{a; *} | Unal, Mustafa^b | Kuru, Omer^a

Affiliations: [a] Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical Faculty, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey | [b] Department of Family Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey

Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Dilek Durmus, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical Faculty, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey. Tel.: +90 362 312 19 19 3091; Fax: +90 362 4576041; E-mail: drdilekdurmus@yahoo.com

Abstract: Background and Objectives:The aim of this trial is to search effectiveness of specifically adapted exercise programs on its own and with low back school on pain, disability, trunk and quadriceps muscle strength, walking performance, spinal mobility, quality of life (QOL), and depression in the patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Material and Method:A total of 121 patients with definite CLBP were included in this study. The patients were randomized into two groups. Group 1 (n=60) was given exercises only and accepted as the control group. Group 2 (n=61) received back school program and exercises. The exercise treatment was performed 3 days a week, for 3 months. The pain (visual analog scale, VAS), disability (Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, ODQ), walking performance (6 minute walking test, 6MWT), depression (Beck Depression Inventory scores, BDI), and QOL (Short Form 36, SF-36) of all participants were evaluated. The trunk and knee muscle strength were measured with a handheld dynamometer. Patients were assessed at baseline (BT), at the end of treatment (AT), and at the six month follow-up (F). Results:Statistically significant improvements were found between groups regarding all of the clinical parameters over time. Pain, disability, muscle strength, endurance, 6MWT, mobility, QOL, and depression of both groups also showed improvements AT. These improvements persisted at 6-months follow-ups (P < 0.05). There were statistically significant differences between the groups for pain, disability, muscle strength, endurance, 6MWT, QOL, and depression regarding the change scores between AT–BT test and F–BT test (P < 0.05). Group 2 improved more than group 1 except for mobility. Conclusion:Exercise programs can be modified and used successfully in CLBP and this effect can be increased with addition of back school further. Level of Evidence:Diagnostic study Level-I-I (prospective study).

Keywords: Chronic low back pain, exercise, back school, muscle strength, pain, disability, endurance, quality of life, depression

DOI: 10.3233/BMR-140481

Journal: Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 553-561, 2014