Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Kim, Dae-Huna; * | Park, Jin-Kyub | Jeong, Myeong-Kyunc
Affiliations: [a] Department of Physical Therapy, Kyungdong University, Kangwon-do, Korea | [b] Department of Neurosurgery, Goodspine Hospital, Gyeonggi-Do, Korea | [c] Institute of Rehabilitation Therapy, Hongik Hospital, Seoul, Korea
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Dae-Hun Kim, Department of Physical Therapy, Kyungdong University, Toseong-myeon Bongpo-4gil 46, Goseong-gun, Kangwon-do, Korea. Tel.: +82 33 639 0227; Fax: +82 33 639 0239; E-mail: vertetrac@k1.ac.kr
Abstract: Background Data:In patients with chronic low back pain, the center of gravity (COG) is abnormally located posterior to the center in most cases. Objective:The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of posterior-located COG on the functions (lumbar extension strength, and static and dynamic balance) and structure (lumbar lordosis angle and lumbosacral angle) of the lumbar spine. Material and Methods:In this study, the COG of chronic low back pain patients who complained of only low back pain were examined using dynamic body balance equipment. A total of 164 subjects participated in the study (74 males and 90 females), and they were divided into two groups of 82 patients each. One group (n=82) consisted of patients whose COG was located at the center (C-COG); the other group (n=82) consisted of patients whose COG was located posterior to the center (P-COG). The following measures assessed the lumber functions and structures of the two groups: lumbar extension strength, moving speed of static and dynamic COGs, movement distance of the static and dynamic COGs, lumbar lordosis angle, and lumbosacral angle. The measured values were analyzed using independent t-tests. Results:The group of patients with P-COG showed more decreases in lumbar extension strength, lumbar lordosis angle, and lumbosacral angle compared to the group of patients with C-COG. Also this group showed increases in moving speed and movement distance of the static COG. However, there were no differences in moving speed and movement distance of the dynamic COG between the two groups. Conclusions:These findings suggest that chronic LBP patients with P-COG have some disadvantages to establish lumbar extension strength and static and dynamic balance, which require specific efforts to maintain a neutral position and to control posture.
Keywords: Balance, low back pain, lumbopelvic neutralization
DOI: 10.3233/BMR-130442
Journal: Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 231-237, 2014
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl