Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Çıtak Karakaya, İlkima; * | Karakaya, Mehmet Gürhana | Erğun, Esrab | Elmalı, Sedanurc | Fırat, Tüzünd
Affiliations: [a] Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Muğla School of Health, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey | [b] Avicenna Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey | [c] Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Tokat State Hospital, Tokat, Turkey | [d] Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: İlkim Çıtak Karakaya, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Muıgla School of Health, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, 48000, Muğla, Turkey. Tel.: +90 252 2113205; E-mail: ilkim74@yahoo.com, ikarakaya@mu.edu.tr
Abstract: Background:Pulse frequency is one of the key determinants of analgesic outcomes by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). However, optimal settings remain unclear. Objective:To compare the effects of different frequencies of TENS, on pressure pain threshold and tolerance. Methods:Currents with pulse duration of 110 μs, and pulse frequencies of 60 pps or 150 pps were applied on the volar aspects of the dominant forearms of 20 healthy volunteers, on two consecutive days, in a randomized order. Threshold and tolerance were measured at the beginning, after the 15th and 30th minutes of the applications, and 30 minutes after the applications. Results:Pressure pain threshold and tolerance values were higher at the 150 pps frequency, at all measurement times (p< 0.05). However, no frequencyXtime interaction and time-dependent changes were found for the outcome measures (p> 0.05). Conclusions:These findings established that, at 150 pps conventional TENS, threshold and tolerance values were consistently higher. These results are presented to inform future research regarding optimal conventional TENS parameters and to provide support for clinical applications.
Keywords: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, frequency, pressure pain threshold, pressure pain tolerance, algometer
DOI: 10.3233/BMR-130436
Journal: Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 197-201, 2014
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl