Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Fukuda, Keijia | Umezu, Yuichia; * | Shiba, Naotoa | Tajima, Fumihirob | Nagata, Kenseic
Affiliations: [a] Rehabilitation Center, Kurume University, 155-1 Kokubu-machi, Kurume City, Fukuoka 8390863, Japan | [b] Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, School of Medicine, Wakayama, Japan | [c] Department of Orthopedics, Kurume University, School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Yuichi Umezu, Rehabilitation Center, Kurume University 155-1 Kokubu-machi, Kurume City, Fukuoka 8390863, Japan. Tel.: +81 942 22 6111; Fax: +81 942 22 6538; E-mail: umezu@med.kurume-u.ac.jp
Abstract: Objectives:To compare back muscle endurance during the trunk holding test with and without remote muscle contraction using electromyographic (EMG) power spectral analyses. Methods:Eleven healthy male subjects were studied during the unsupported trunk holding test without grip power and with 20% and 50% grip power. Surface electrodes were placed over each erector spinae muscle at L1 level. Median frequency (MF) and mean power frequency (MPF) were evaluated by the ME3000P Fast Fourier Transform spectral analysis program. The rate of change was determined for each parameter during the test, and significance was examined by the Wilcoxon matched-pair signed-rank test. Results:Both MF and MPF decreases with 20% grip power were significantly faster than without grip power (p=0.003 and 0.012). Both indices decreases with 50% grip power were significantly slower than with 20% grip power (MF: p=0.004, MPF: p=0.041). Conclusion:Changes in back muscle endurance by remote muscle contraction were confirmed using EMG power spectral analysis. We found that back muscle endurance with 20% grip power was lower than without remote muscle contraction, and the endurance with 50% grip power increased than with 20% grip power.
Keywords: Muscle endurance, electromyography, frequency, remote muscle contraction
DOI: 10.3233/BMR-2006-192-304
Journal: Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, vol. 19, no. 2-3, pp. 61-66, 2006
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl