Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Issue title: Evaluating Ambient Assisted Living Components and Systems
Guest editors: Stefano Chessa, Juan Antonio Alvarez García and Paolo Barsocchi
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Salvi, Darioa; * | Montalvá Colomer, Juan Bautistaa | Arredondo, Maria Teresaa | Prazak-Aram, Barbarab | Mayer, Christopherb
Affiliations: [a] Life Supporting Technologies, E.T.S.I. Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Avenida Complutense 30, Madrid, Spain. E-mails: dsalvi@lst.tfo.upm.es, jmontalva@lst.tfo.upm.es, mta@lst.tfo.upm.es | [b] AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, Health & Environment Department, Biomedical Systems, Donau-City-Str. 1, 1220 Vienna, Austria. E-mails: barbara.prazak-aram@ait.ac.at, christopher.mayer@ait.ac.at
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author. E-mail: dsalvi@lst.tfo.upm.es.
Abstract: Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) technologies aim at supporting elderly and disabled people in their environment, with affordable, easy to use and meaningful ICT tools. Given the complexity of AAL, software platforms are needed to abstract and reuse typical functionalities. To this purpose, the universAAL project was established to create an open platform that provides a standardized approach making it technically feasible and economically viable to develop AAL solutions. In order to make AAL technologies widely accepted, high quality must be guaranteed, but measuring quality in AAL is difficult because of the variety of stakeholders, the wide set of needs addressed and the heterogeneity of the employed technologies. This paper proposes a methodological framework for evaluating AAL solutions with the aim of prioritizing evaluation needs, customizing assessment techniques and producing value for the project. The framework is based on empirical methods and on scientific-like theory building mixed with the standard ISO/IEC 25000 for software quality. It can be applied for both technical and non-technical (end-user) evaluations. To support the framework, the results of its application in universAAL are shown, i.e., how it was used at different stages of the project for assessing the results, for taking decisions and for building scientific knowledge.
Keywords: Ambient Assisted Living, evaluation methodologies, verification and validation, universAAL
DOI: 10.3233/AIS-150317
Journal: Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 329-352, 2015
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl