Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Qi, Hengniana; 1 | Zhu, Xiaoronga; 1 | Ren, Yinxiab | Zhang, Xiaoyaa | Tang, Qizhea | Zhang, Chua | Lang, Qingc; * | Wang, Linab; *
Affiliations: [a] Department of Information Engineering, Huzhou University, Huzhou, China | [b] School of Medicine and Nursing, Huzhou University, Huzhou, China | [c] Library, Huzhou University, Huzhou, China
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Lina Wang, No. 759, Erhuandong Road, Huzhou City, Zhejiang Province, 313000, P.R. China. Tel.: +86 13587278357; E-mail: 02474@zjhu.edu.cn and Qing Lang, No. 759, Erhuandong Road, Huzhou City, Zhejiang Province, 313000, P.R. China. Tel.: +86 13819233616; E-mail: 02476@zjhu.edu.cn.
Note: [1] These authors contributed equally to this work.
Abstract: Background:Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease that is not easily detected in the early stage. Handwriting and walking have been shown to be potential indicators of cognitive decline and are often affected by AD. Objective:This study proposes an assisted screening framework for AD based on multimodal analysis of handwriting and gait and explores whether using a combination of multiple modalities can improve the accuracy of single modality classification. Methods:We recruited 90 participants (38 AD patients and 52 healthy controls). The handwriting data was collected under four handwriting tasks using dot-matrix digital pens, and the gait data was collected using an electronic trail. The two kinds of features were fused as inputs for several different machine learning models (Logistic Regression, SVM, XGBoost, Adaboost, LightGBM), and the model performance was compared. Results:The accuracy of each model ranged from 71.95% to 96.17%. Among them, the model constructed by LightGBM had the best performance, with an accuracy of 96.17%, sensitivity of 95.32%, specificity of 96.78%, PPV of 95.94%, NPV of 96.74%, and AUC of 0.991. However, the highest accuracy of a single modality was 93.53%, which was achieved by XGBoost in gait features. Conclusions:The research results show that the combination of handwriting features and gait features can achieve better classification results than a single modality. In addition, the assisted screening model proposed in this study can achieve effective classification of AD, which has development and application prospects.
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, feature fusion, gait, handwriting, machine learning
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-240362
Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 75-89, 2024
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl