Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Panzavolta, Andreaa | Cerami, Chiaraa; b; * | Marcone, Alessandrac | Zamboni, Michelec | Iannaccone, Sandroc | Dodich, Alessandrad
Affiliations: [a] IUSS Cognitive Neuroscience ICoN Center, Scuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS Pavia, Pavia, Italy | [b] IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy | [c] Department of Rehabilitation and Functional Recovery, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy | [d] Center for Neurocognitive Rehabilitation - CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto (TN), Italy
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Chiara Cerami, MD, Scuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS Pavia, Piazza della Vittoria 15, 27100, Pavia, Italy. Tel.: +39 0382 375844; Fax: +39 0382 375899; E-mail: chiara.cerami@iusspavia.it.
Abstract: Background:Although social cognitive dysfunction is a major feature of the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD), quantitative measurement of social behavior changes is poorly available in clinical settings. Objective:The aim of the study is to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of social-emotional questionnaires in distinguishing bvFTD from healthy control (HC) subjects and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients. Methods:We enrolled 29 bvFTD, 24 AD, and 18 HC subjects matched for age, sex, and education. Two informant-based measures of socio-emotional sensitivity and empathy (i.e., revised Self-Monitoring Scale (rSMS) and Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI)) were administered. One-way ANOVA was performed to compare groups, whereas Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve analysis tested questionnaire ability in distinguishing groups. A short version of IRI (sIRI) was obtained by excluding the non-contributing subscale (i.e., personal distress). Results:Compared to HC and AD, bvFTD showed significantly lower scores in rSMS and IRI scores, except for IRI personal distress subscale. The sIRI showed an excellent performance in early diagnosis (bvFTD versus HC = AUC 0.95). Both sIRI and rSMS showed good performance in distinguishing bvFTD from AD (AUC 0.83). Conclusions:ROC analyses support the usefulness of informant social questionnaires in memory clinics and their potential value in screening procedures for research eligibility in forthcoming trials. In the timely diagnosis of bvFTD patients, IRI and rSMS may supply crucial information for the early detection of signs and symptoms affecting social-emotional skills, which might otherwise be underrecognized.
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, diagnostic accuracy, frontotemporal dementia, interpersonal reactivity index, revised self-monitoring scale, social cognition
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-230591
Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 1249-1260, 2024
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl