Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Azami, Hameda; b; * | Daftarifard, Elhamc | Humeau-Heurtier, Anned | Fernandez, Albertoe | Abasolo, Danielf | Rajji, Tarek K.a; b; g
Affiliations: [a] Adult Neurodevelopment and Geriatric Psychiatry Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada | [b] Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada | [c] Department of Pharmaceutics, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran | [d] Université Angers, LARIS, SFR MathSTIC, Angers, France | [e] Department of Legal Medicine, Psychiatry and Pathology, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain | [f] Centre for Biomedical Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK | [g] Toronto Dementia Research Alliance, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Hamed Azami, Adult Neurodevelopment and Geriatric Psychiatry Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada. E-mail: hamed.azami@camh.ca.
Abstract: Background:Nonlinear dynamical measures, such as fractal dimension (FD), entropy, and Lempel-Ziv complexity (LZC), have been extensively investigated individually for detecting information content in magnetoencephalograms (MEGs) from patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Objective:To compare systematically the performance of twenty conventional and recently introduced nonlinear dynamical measures in studying AD versus mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and healthy control (HC) subjects using MEG. Methods:We compared twenty nonlinear measures to distinguish MEG recordings from 36 AD (mean age = 74.06±6.95 years), 18 MCI (mean age = 74.89±5.57 years), and 26 HC subjects (mean age = 71.77±6.38 years) in different brain regions and also evaluated the effect of the length of MEG epochs on their performance. We also studied the correlation between these measures and cognitive performance based on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Results:The results obtained by LZC, zero-crossing rate (ZCR), FD, and dispersion entropy (DispEn) measures showed significant differences among the three groups. There was no significant difference between HC and MCI. The highest Hedge’s g effect sizes for HC versus AD and MCI versus AD were respectively obtained by Higuchi’s FD (HFD) and fuzzy DispEn (FuzDispEn) in the whole brain and was most prominent in left lateral. The results obtained by HFD and FuzDispEn had a significant correlation with the MMSE scores. DispEn-based techniques, LZC, and ZCR, compared with HFD, were less sensitive to epoch length in distinguishing HC form AD. Conclusions:FuzDispEn was the most consistent technique to distinguish MEG dynamical patterns in AD compared with HC and MCI.
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, entropy, fractal dimension, magnetoencephalogram, mild cognitive impairment, nonlinear dynamics
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-230544
Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 1151-1162, 2023
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl