Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Datlow, Lindsay Y.a | King, Jaya | Leventhal, Marka | Wallace, Taylor C.b; c; d; *
Affiliations: [a] SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA | [b] Think Healthy Group, Inc., Washington, DC, USA | [c] School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA | [d] Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Taylor C. Wallace, 525 U Street NW, Washington, DC, USA. Tel.: +1 270 839 1776; E-mail: taylor.wallace@me.com.
Abstract: Background:Pork provides higher levels of several nutrients important for cognitive maintenance in older adults. A pilot clinical study suggests the addition of moderate amounts of pork to a Mediterranean-style diet improves cognition in older adults. There is an absence of observational research that isolates effects of pork from other red meats. Objective:To examine the relationship of pork intake on cognitive performance in older adults. Methods:Cross-sectional data from the U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2011–2014 cycles were used in these analyses. Pork intake was assessed using data from two non-consecutive 24-h dietary recalls. Cognitive function was assessed by the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD) Word Learning, CERAD Delayed Recall, Animal Fluency, and Digital Substitution tests. Statistical analyses were adjusted for sample weighting and survey design variables to account for the complex design. Student t-tests (continuous variables) and Pearson chi-squared tests (categorical variables) were employed to compare participant characteristics between the low and normal cognitive performance groups. Logistic regression was used to determine the relationship of pork intake (low, medium, and high) with prevalence of low cognitive performance, with the non-consumer group as the referent category. Results:Pork intake was not beneficially or detrimentally associated performance on the any of the cognitive tests in both the crude and multivariate models (p > 0.05). Conclusions:Prospective cohort investigations and larger/longer-term clinical trials are needed to fully elucidate effects of pork intake on cognition in older adults.
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, cognition, nutrition surveys, pork meat, red meat
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-230474
Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 351-358, 2023
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl