You are viewing a javascript disabled version of the site. Please enable Javascript for this site to function properly.
Go to headerGo to navigationGo to searchGo to contentsGo to footer
In content section. Select this link to jump to navigation

Erratum to: Is Engagement in Intellectual and Social Leisure Activities Protective Against Dementia Risk? Evidence from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing

Pamela Almeida-Meza, Andrew Steptoe and Dorina Cadar

[Journal of Alzheimer‖s Disease, 80(2) (2021), 555-565, 10.3233/JAD-200952] https://content.iospress.com/articles/journal-of-alzheimers-disease/jad200952

In Table 4 on page 562 of the original version of this article, the results for ‘Single or divorced’ and ‘Married or remarried’ categories under Hobby*marital status (p = 0.044) in the first column are mistakenly swapped. Therefore the fields ‘Single or divorced’ and ‘Married or remarried’ should be reversed. This issue is only related to Table 4, and the in-text results are correct.

The updated and corrected Table 4 has been placed in its entirety below.

Table 4

Sub-hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals of the competing risk models indicating the incidence of dementia for individual activities with significant interactions for sex and marital status

Individual leisure activitiesModel 1Model 2Model 3Model 4
Reading newspapers*sex (p = 0.061)
Males: No1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
Yes1.03 (0.73 - 1.46)1.02 (0.72 - 1.46)1.02 (0.72 - 1.47)1.04 (0.73 – 1.50)
Females: No1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
Yes0.64 (0.49 – 0.84)**0.65 (0.50 - 0.85)*0.65 (0.50 - 0.86)*0.65 (0.49 - 0.84)**
Phone use*sex (p = 0.056)
Males: No1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
Yes0.58 (0.42 - 0.79)**0.62 (0.45 - 0.84)*0.62 (0.45 - 0.85)*0.61 (0.45 - 0.84)*
Females: No1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
Yes0.95 (0.73 - 1.24)0.98 (0.74 – 1.31)0.99 (0.75 - 1.33)1.05 (0.78 - 1.40)
Hobby*marital status (p = 0.044)
Married or remarried: No1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
Yes0.58 (0.43 - 0.77)**0.62 (0.46 - 0.85)*0.66 (0.49 - 0.89)*0.70 (0.51 - 0.95)*
Single or divorced: No1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
Yes1.14 (0.57 - 2.26)1.09 (0.54 - 2.20)1.42 (0.67 - 3.01)1.43 (0.67 - 3.07)
Widowed: No1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]1 [Reference]
Yes0.91 (0.60 - 1.41)0.93 (0.60 - 1.44)0.98 (0.63 - 1.52)1.01 (0.64 – 1.60)

Model 1: Sex and marital status. Model 2: Model 1 + education and wealth. Model 3: Model 2 + physical health covariates and depression. Model 4: Model 3 + lifestyle factors. *p < 0.05, **p0.001.