Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Abdullah, Shahbaza; b; * | Critchfield, Matthewa | Maltby, Johnc | Mukaetova-Ladinska, Elizabeta B.a; c
Affiliations: [a] The Evington Centre, Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust, Leicester, UK | [b] Leicestershire, Northamptonshire & Rutland (LNR) Foundation School, Leicester, UK | [c] Department of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Shahbaz Abdullah, MBBS, BSc, The Evington Centre, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, LE5 4QG, UK. E-mail: shahbaz121@msn.com.
Abstract: Background: Cognitive decline is classically attributed to organic causes such as dementia; however, depression can play a role in cognitive decline. Objective: To evaluate cognitive screening tools and the 4-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-4) for use in primary care to distinguish cognitive decline secondary to depression. Method: Clinical data collected over 2.5 years for assessed patients in a secondary clinical service for younger adults. Cognitive screening tools (General Practitioner Assessment of Cognition, Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-III, Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale, Salzburg Dementia Test Prediction) and GDS-4 were analyzed for their accuracy to differentiate patients with cognitive decline due to depression from those with subjective cognitive complaints. Results: 180 young adults seen in a memory clinic setting (< 65 years) were included. These individuals either had a diagnosis of depression (n = 46) or no cognitive impairment on assessment (n = 134) despite having subjective cognitive complaints. All used cognitive tools had poor accuracy in differentiating cognitive decline secondary to depression from subjective cognitive complaints. The GDS-4 alone, however, was able to differentiate with high accuracy (AUC = 0.818) individuals who had cognitive problems secondary to depression. Conclusion: Cognitive screening tools used alone are ineffective in discriminating cognitive decline secondary to depression. Incorporating the GDS-4 into the screening process by primary practitioners could facilitate early identification and treatment of depression in younger people, avoiding unnecessary referrals memory services.
Keywords: Cognitive decline, cognitive tools, depression, 4-item geriatric depression score
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-215552
Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 1797-1804, 2022
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl