Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Mukaetova-Ladinska, Elizabeta B.a; b; * | Abdullah, Shahbaza; c | Critchfield, Mathewa | Maltby, Johnb
Affiliations: [a] The Evington Center, Leicesterhire Partership NHS Trust, Leicester, UK | [b] Department of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK | [c] Leicestershire, Northamptonshire & Rutland (LNR) Foundation School, Leicester, UK
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Elizabeta B. Mukaetova-Ladinska, MD, MMedSci, PhD, MRCPsych, The Evington Centre, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Road, Leicester, LE5 4QG, UK. E-mail: eml12@le.ac.uk.
Abstract: Background:Memory complaints are frequent among young adults presenting in general practice. Many of them will have reversable, functional cognitive impairment that can easily be mistaken for dementia. Its accurate and timely identification is warranted to prevent further escalation to overt dementia syndrome. Objective:To evaluate the recommended primary care screening cognitive tools for dementia for use in younger people. Methods:2.5 years clinical data were collected during the course of ongoing patient care for all assessed face-to-face patients in a secondary care memory service for younger adults. Cognitive screening and assessment tests used in primary [General Practice Assessment of Cognition (GPCOG)] and secondary [Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-III (ACE-III), Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS), Salzburg Dementia Test Prediction (SDTP)] care were analyzed for their accuracy to identify dementia and memory complaints. Area under the curve in receiver operating characteristic curves was used to measure predictive value of tests for a clinical diagnosis of dementia. Results:348 young adults were assessed for cognitive impairment. Following comprehensive Memory Clinic assessments, 241 (69.25%) were diagnosed with memory complaints in the absence of relevant neuropathology and 107 with dementia. GPCOG, especially the informant part, and RUDAS had low accuracy to identify dementia (AUC = 0.465 and AUC = 0.698, respectively). In contrast, ACE-III and SDTP demonstrated the highest accuracy (AUC = 0.799 and AUC = 0.809/0.817, respectively). Conclusion:Dementia screening in younger people will benefit from SDTP incorporated as part of the screening cognitive toolset. The national guidance on dementia screening tools, diagnostic pathways, and management should also refer to younger adults.
Keywords: Cognitive impairment, cognitive screening, dementia, primary health care, suspected dementia, young adults
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-215514
Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 333-341, 2022
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl