Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Zammit, Andrea R.a; b; * | Yang, Jingyuna; c | Buchman, Aron S.a; c | Leurgans, Sue E.a; c | Muniz-Terrera, Gracielad | Lipton, Richard B.e; f | Hall, Charles B.e; f | Boyle, Patriciaa; b | Bennett, David A.a; c
Affiliations: [a] Rush Alzheimer’s Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA | [b] Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA | [c] Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA | [d] University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK | [e] Saul B. Korey Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA | [f] Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Andrea R. Zammit, Rush Alzheimer’s Disease Center, 1750 W Harrison St, Suite 1000, Chicago, IL 60612, USA. Tel.: +1 347 844 3185; E-mail: Andrea_R_Zammit@rush.edu.
Abstract: Background:Methods that can identify subgroups with different trajectories of cognitive decline are crucial for isolating the biologic mechanisms which underlie these groupings. Objective:This study grouped older adults based on their baseline cognitive profiles using a latent variable approach and tested the hypothesis that these groups would differ in their subsequent trajectories of cognitive change. Methods:In this study we applied time-varying effects models (TVEMs) to examine the longitudinal trajectories of cognitive decline across different subgroups of older adults in the Rush Memory and Aging Project. Results:A total of 1,662 individuals (mean age = 79.6 years, SD = 7.4, 75.4%female) participated in the study; these were categorized into five previously identified classes of older adults differing in their baseline cognitive profiles: Superior Cognition (n = 328, 19.7%), Average Cognition (n = 767, 46.1%), Mixed-Domains Impairment (n = 71, 4.3%), Memory-Specific Impairment (n = 274, 16.5%), and Frontal Impairment (n = 222, 13.4%). Differences in the trajectories of cognition for these five classes persisted during 8 years of follow-up. Compared with the Average Cognition class, The Mixed-Domains and Memory-Specific Impairment classes showed steeper rates of decline, while other classes showed moderate declines. Conclusion:Baseline cognitive classes of older adults derived through the use of latent variable methods were associated with distinct longitudinal trajectories of cognitive decline that did not converge during an average of 8 years of follow-up.
Keywords: Cognitive decline, cognitive function, cognitive impairment, cognitive trajectories, latent classes
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-210484
Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 641-652, 2021
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl