Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Schmidt, Sergio L.a; * | Boechat, Yolanda Eliza Moreiraa; b | Schmidt, Guilherme J.a | Nicaretta, Denisea | van Duinkerken, Eelcoa | Schmidt, Juliana J.a
Affiliations: [a] Department of Neurology, Federal University of The State of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil | [b] Department of Geriatrics, Fluminense Federal University, Niteroi, Brazil
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Prof. Sergio L. Schmidt, R. Mariz e Barros, 775 - Maracanã, Rio de Janeiro - RJ, 20270-004, Brazil. E-mail: slschmidt@terra.com.br.
Abstract: Background:The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale is commonly used to stage cognitive impairment, despite having educational limitations. In elderly with low education, a previous study has shown that intraindividual variability of reaction time (CV) and commission errors (CE), measured using a culture-free Go/No-Go task, can reliably distinguish early Alzheimer’s disease (AD) from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and healthy controls. Objective:We aimed to extend the clinical utility of this culture-free Go/No-Go task in a sample with high educational disparity. Methods:One hundred and ten participants with a wide range of years of formal education (0–14 years) were randomly selected from a geriatric unit and divided based on their CDR scores into cognitively unimpaired (CDR = 0), MCI (CDR = 0.5), and early AD (CDR = 1). All underwent a 90-s reaction-time test that measured the variables previously found to predict CDR in low educated elderly. Here we added years of formal education (educational level) to the model. Multivariate analyses compared differences in group means using educational level as confounding factor. A confirmatory discriminant analyses was performed, to assess if CDR scores could be predicted by the two Go/No-Go variables in a sample with high educational disparity. Results:Over all three groups, differences in both CE and CV reached statistical significance (p < 0.05). The discriminant analysis demonstrated that CV and CE discriminated cognitively impaired from cognitively normal elderly. These results remained similar when discriminating MCI from cognitively unimpaired elderly. Conclusion:The Go/No-Go task reliably discriminates elderly with MCI from elderly without cognitive impairment independent of educational disparity.
Keywords: Attention, cognitive dysfunction, dementia, neuropsychology, reaction time
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-210151
Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 691-697, 2021
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl