Affiliations: [a] Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, BC, Canada
| [b] Institute on Aging and Lifelong Health, University of Victoria, BC, Canada
| [c] Division of Medical Sciences, University of Victoria, BC, Canada
Correspondence:
[*]
Correspondence to: Ashleigh Parker, MSc, Department of Psychology, P. O. Box 1700 STN CSC, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia V8W 2Y2, Canada. Tel.: +1 250 721 7549; E-mail: ashleighparker@uvic.ca.
Note: [1] Data used in preparation of this article were obtained from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database (http://adni.loni.usc.edu). As such, the investigators within the ADNI contributed to the design and implementation of ADNI and/or provided data but did not participate in analysis or writing of this report. A complete listing of ADNI investigators can be found at: http://adni.loni.usc.edu/wp-content/uploads/how_to_apply/ADNI_Acknowledgement_List.pdf
Abstract: Background:Individuals with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) are thought to be the earliest along the cognitive continuum between healthy aging and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Objective:The current study used a multi-modal neuroimaging approach to examine differences in brain structure and function between individuals with SCD and healthy controls (HC). Methods:3T high-resolution anatomical images and resting-state functional MRI scans were retrieved for 23 individuals with SCD and 23 HC from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database. Results:The SCD and HC groups were not significantly different in age or education level. Voxel-based morphometry results did not show significant differences in grey matter volume between the groups. Functional MRI results revealed significantly greater functional connectivity in the default mode network in regions including the bilateral precuneus cortex, bilateral thalamus, and right hippocampal regions in individuals with SCD relative to controls. Conversely, those with SCD showed decreased functional connectivity in the bilateral frontal pole, caudate, angular gyrus, and lingual gyrus, compared to HC. Conclusion:Findings revealed differences in brain function but not structure between individuals with SCD and HC. Overall, this study represents a crucial step in characterizing individuals with SCD, a group recognized to be at increased risk for AD. It is imperative to identify biomarkers of AD prior to significant decline on clinical assessment, so that disease-delaying interventions may be delivered at the earliest possible time point.
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, magnetic resonance imaging, neuroimaging, subjective cognitive decline
