Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Yeh, Tian-Shina | Wang, Jung-Derb; c | Ku, Li-Jung Elizabethb
Affiliations: [a] Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA | [b] Department of Public Health, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan | [c] Departments of Internal Medicine and Occupational and Environmental Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Li-Jung Elizabeth Ku, PhD, Department of Public Health, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, No, 1, University Road, Tainan, Taiwan. Tel.: +886 6 2353535 5565; Fax: +886 6 2359033; E-mail: eljku@mail.ncku.edu.tw.
Abstract: Background:People with early onset Alzheimer’s disease (EOAD) seem to suffer greater impact. But there is a lack of population-based studies on loss of life expectancy (LE) and lifetime healthcare costs. Objectives:We conducted this study to estimate LE, expected years of life lost (EYLL), and lifetime healthcare costs for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in Taiwan stratified by onset age and gender, using a method which integrates the product of the survival function and the mean cost function over a lifetime horizon. Methods:We linked the National Health Insurance datasets with the National Mortality Registry and extrapolated the survival to lifetime to estimate the mean cumulative costs since the date of the first AD diagnosis using medical claims between 2001 and 2012. Results:A total of 21,615 mild to moderate AD patients (including 20,358 late-onset (LOAD) and 1,257 EOAD) were recruited. The average onset age for EOAD was 61 years old, while that of LOAD was 78. Although the LE of EOAD was 4.8 years longer than that of LOAD due to younger age, the EYLL for the former was 8.7 years versus 1.7 years for the latter. EOAD also had higher lifetime healthcare costs than the LOAD group (USD$37,957±2,403 versus 33,809±786). Conclusions:Since EOAD patients had both higher EYLL and lifetime healthcare costs than LOAD, future studies should pay more attention to the needs of EOAD patients.
Keywords: Early-onset Alzheimer’s disease, healthcare costs, late-onset Alzheimer’s disease, life expectancy
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-181060
Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 307-315, 2020
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl