Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Pillai, Jagan A.a; b; c; * | Appleby, Brian S.d; e; f | Safar, Jirid | Leverenz, James B.a; b; c
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Jagan A Pillai, MBBS, PhD, Staff Neurologist, Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, 9500 Euclid Avenue, U10, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. Tel.: +1 216 636 9467; Fax: +1 216 445 7013; E-mail: pillaij@ccf.org.
Abstract: Background:A rapidly progressive phenotype of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has been described in some prion disease cohorts. Limited information regarding rapidly progressive AD (rpAD) is available from longitudinal national cohorts. Objective:To compare the clinical characteristics of rpAD in two different national cohorts. Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on AD subjects with available neuropathology in the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center (NACC) database and among neuropathologically characterized AD cases from the National Prion Disease Pathology Surveillance Center (NPDPSC) that were evaluated for suspected prion disease. In the NACC cohort, rpAD was delineated by the lower 10th percentile of follow up duration from pre-dementia to death duration among subjects meeting pathological diagnosis of AD. Results:rpAD from the NPDPSC had a shorter mean symptom duration than the NACC identified rpAD cases (11.6 months versus 62.4 months) and were also younger at the time of their death (60.0 versus 81.8 years). NACC identified rpAD subjects, beginning from a predementia stage, had slower rate of MMSE change per year than NPDPSC cases (2.5 versus 6.0 points). Conclusions:rpAD constitute an important subset of AD subjects in whom a rapid course of symptomatic clinical decline is noted, as confirmed in both national cohorts. rpAD was best characterized by survival time (≤3 years), as there were clear differences between the rpAD cohorts in terms of symptom duration, age at death, and MMSE change per year, likely due to the strong selection biases. rpAD could shed light on the biology of rate of progression in AD.
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, dementia, rapidly progressive dementia, rate of decline
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-180155
Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 973-980, 2018
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl