Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Mowrey, Wenzhu B.a; c; * | Lipton, Richard B.b; c | Katz, Mindy J.b; c | Ramratan, Wendy S.b; c | Loewenstein, David A.d | Zimmerman, Molly E.b; c | Buschke, Hermanb; c
Affiliations: [a] Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA | [b] Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA | [c] The Einstein Aging Study, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA | [d] Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Wenzhu B. Mowrey, Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA. Tel.: +1 718 430 2765; Fax: +1 718 430 2608; E-mail: wenzhu.mowrey@einstein.yu.edu.
Abstract: Background: The Memory Binding Test (MBT), previously known as Memory Capacity Test, has demonstrated discriminative validity for distinguishing persons with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and dementia from cognitively normal elderly. Objective: We aimed to assess the predictive validity of the MBT for incident aMCI. Methods: In a longitudinal, community-based study of adults aged 70+, we administered the MBT to 246 cognitively normal elderly adults at baseline and followed them annually. Based on previous work, a subtle reduction in memory binding at baseline was defined by a Total Items in the Paired (TIP) condition score of ≤22 on the MBT. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the predictive validity of the MBT for incident aMCI accounting for the effects of covariates. The hazard ratio of incident aMCI was also assessed for different prediction time windows ranging from 4 to 7 years of follow-up, separately. Results: Among 246 controls who were cognitively normal at baseline, 48 developed incident aMCI during follow-up. A baseline MBT reduction was associated with an increased risk for developing incident aMCI (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.44, 95% confidence interval: 1.30–4.56, p = 0.005). When varying the prediction window from 4–7 years, the MBT reduction remained significant for predicting incident aMCI (HR range: 2.33–3.12, p: 0.0007–0.04). Conclusion: Persons with poor performance on the MBT are at significantly greater risk for developing incident aMCI. High hazard ratios up to seven years of follow-up suggest that the MBT is sensitive to early disease.
Keywords: Aging, Alzheimer’s disease, cognition, dementia, longitudinal studies, memory, mild cognitive impairment, preclinical, survival analysis
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-160291
Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 1585-1595, 2016
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl