Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Gramunt, Ninaa; * | Sánchez-Benavides, Gonzaloa | Buschke, Hermanb | Lipton, Richard B.b | Masramon, Xavierc | Gispert, Juan D.a | Peña-Casanova, Jordid | Fauria, Karinea | Molinuevo, José L.a
Affiliations: [a] Clinical Research Program, Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center, Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain | [b] Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine. Bronx, NY, USA | [c] SAIL Statistics, Barcelona, Spain | [d] Department of Behavioral Neurology, Service of Neurology, Hospital del Mar, Parc Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain
Correspondence: [*] Correspondence to: Nina Gramunt, Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center, Dr. Aiguader, 88 – 08003 Barcelona, Spain. Tel.: +34 933160990; Fax: +34 933160996; E-mail: ngramunt@fpmaragall.org.
Abstract: Background:Episodic memory testing is fundamental for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Although the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT) is widely used for this purpose, it may not be sensitive enough for early detection of subtle decline in preclinical AD. The Memory Binding Test (MBT) intends to overcome this limitation. Objectives:To analyze the test-retest reliability of the MBT and its convergent validity with the FCRST. Methods:36 cognitively healthy participants of the ALFA Study, aged 45 to 65, were included for the test-retest study and 69 for the convergent analysis. They were visited twice in a period of 6 ± 2 weeks. Test-retest reliability was determined by the calculation of the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Score differences were studied by computing the mean percentage of score variation between visits and visualized by Bland-Altman plots. Convergent validity was determined by Pearson’s correlations. Results:ICC values in the test-retest reliability analysis of the MBT direct scores ranged from 0.64 to 0.76. Subjects showed consistent practice effects, with mean amounts of score increasing between 10% and 26%. Pearson correlation between MBT and FCSRT direct scores showed r values between 0.40 and 0.53. The FCSRT displayed ceiling effects not observed in the MBT. Conclusions:The MBT shows adequate test-retest reliability and overall moderate convergent validity with the FCSRT. Unlike the FCSRT, the MBT does not have ceiling effects and it may therefore be especially useful in longitudinal studies, facilitating the measurement of subtle memory performance decline and the detection of very early AD.
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, early diagnosis, episodic memory, memory assessment, preclinical, psychometrics, reliability, validity
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-150776
Journal: Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 999-1010, 2016
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl