Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: T'Jonck, L.a; * | Lysens, R.a; ** | Witvrouw, E.a | Hulens, M.a | Delvaux, K.a | Peers, K.a
Affiliations: [a] Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Department of Rehabilitation Science, Catholic University of Leuven, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium
Note: [*] Corresponding author. Tel.: +32 16 329110; Fax: +32 16 329197; E-mail: leen.tjonck@Hok.kuleuven.ac.be.
Note: [**] Also at: Physical Therapy Department, University Hospital Leuven, Belgium.
Abstract: In the last decade, more attention is drawn to the complex function of the ankle joint. Isokinetic devices provide an objective and standardised protocol to evaluate the functional plantar and dorsal flexors strength at the ankle. The purpose of this study is to document the effect of positioning, sex and leg dominance on the plantar and dorsal flexion strength. Forty-six subjects (26 females, 20 males) were participated in this study on voluntary base (age range 19–31 year). They were in no way engaged in sports competitions. Isokinetic data was collected using a cybex-II dynamometer at two speeds (60 and 120° /s) and in two positions (prone with extended knee and supine with 90° flexion at the knee and 45° at the hip). Statistical analysis of the peak torque to body weight ratio has revealed significant differences for the plantar as well as the dorsal flexors at 60° /s and 120° /s, with higher values in the prone extended position. We have only found differences between sexes in dorsal flexion at 60° /s for both legs in both positions. No significant differences were obtained between extremities. These findings suggest that plantar and dorsal flexion strength depend on the test position. Sex was a significant factor for dorsal flexion strength at 60° /s. The lack of differences between both legs is an advantage in pathological situations. The non affected limb can be used as a control value. We prefer the prone position with extended knee. Factors that influenced our conclusion are higher strength, better standardisation and better patient comfort.
Keywords: Cybex, Plantar flexor, Dorsal flexor, Dominance, Position, Sex
DOI: 10.3233/IES-1997-6406
Journal: Isokinetics and Exercise Science, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 235-241, 1997
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl