Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Gail, Saschaa; * | Rodefeld, Steffenb | Künzell, Stefana
Affiliations: [a] Institute of Sports Science/Sports Centre, Augsburg University, Augsburg, Germany | [b] Therapy and Training Department, Hessingpark-Clinic GmbH, Augsburg, Germany
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Sascha Gail, Institute of Sports Science/ Sports Centre, Augsburg University, Universitätsstraße 3, 86135 Augsburg, Germany. Tel.: +49 821 598 2827; Fax: +49 821 598 2828; E-mail:sascha.gail@sport.uni-augsburg.de
Abstract: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Multiple repetition maximum (M-RM) strength tests are suitable alternatives to the 1-repetition maximum (1-RM) strength test, particularly in the elderly. In comparison to the 1-RM strength test the research about the reproducibility of M-RM strength tests is very limited, leading to a lack of standardized test protocols for M-RM strength tests. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the test-retest reproducibility of a 5-repetition maximum (5-RM) strength test in older adults. METHODS: After a short preparation session, 28 healthy elderly people older than 60 years (14 men, 14 women) and with at least 3 months strength training experience passed a 5-RM strength test. The test included exercises for the upper body, namely bench press and seated row, and were performed twice within 7 days on the same day of the week at the same time of the day. RESULTS: Significant differences between test and retest (p < 0.05) in 2/6 instances provide evidence of practice-based improvement (PBI). A very high intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC > 0.90; p < 0.001) was found for the total sample as well as for both sub-samples (men, women). The coefficients of variation were very low and ranged between 0.7 and 2.8%. The high test-retest reproducibility was also demonstrated by the narrow limits of agreements, the very little standard errors of measurements and the minimal smallest real differences. CONCLUSION: The present study confirms the reproducibility of the 5-RM strength test for upper body exercises in older adults with strength training experience. The 5-RM strength test is a reliable and simple measurement and can be used in sports practice for theoretical and practical purposes.
Keywords: Maximum strength, strength diagnostics, strength training, training load
DOI: 10.3233/IES-150590
Journal: Isokinetics and Exercise Science, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 291-295, 2015
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl