Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Bohannon, Richard W.a | Pritchard, Robert O.a | Glenney, Susan S.a
Affiliations: [a] Program in Physical Therapy, Department of Kinesiology, Neag School of Education, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
Note: [] Corresponding author: Susan Glenney, 358 Mansfield Rd, Storrs, CT 06269-1101, UAS. Tel.: +1 860 486 5692; Fax: +1 860 486 1588; E-mail: susan.glenney@uconn.edu
Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to describe a portable belt-stabilized hand-held dynamometry (HHD) set-up for measuring knee extension force and to compare the magnitude and reliability of forces obtained with the set-up to those obtained without belt-stabilization. Measures for single-limb knee extension force were obtained via HHD from 16 young participants by 2 testers of substantially different strength. Measurements were obtained during 2 sessions 1 week apart. Testing was performed with participants in a bariatric chair – with and without HHD belt-stabilization. Data from the first session were used to compare the magnitude of knee extension forces. Data from both sessions were used to examine reliability via intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman plots. Forces measured with belt-stabilization were significantly (p< 0.001) higher than those measured without belt-stabilization. The differences were greater for male participants (p=0.006) and the female tester (p=0.001). Intertester reliability was poor for measurements obtained without belt-stabilization (ICC=0.17) but good for measurements obtained with belt-stabilization (ICC =0.84). Differences between testers increased with the magnitude of force measured when no belt-stabilization was provided but not when belt-stabilization was used. Test-retest reliability was good when belt-stabilization was employed (ICC=0.87 and 0.92). When belt-stabilization was not used, the test-retest reliability was acceptable for the male tester (ICC=0.77) but not the female tester (ICC =0.50). In conclusion, the set-up examined is affordable, portable and easy to assemble. It allows for rapid testing of knee extension strength. With HHD belt-stabilization, the set-up can be recommended for clinicians and researchers requiring objective measures of knee extension strength in diverse settings.
Keywords: Measurement, muscle, quadriceps, strength
DOI: 10.3233/IES-130517
Journal: Isokinetics and Exercise Science, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 325-329, 2013
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl