Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: da Silva, Rubens A.a; b | Larivière, Christiana; d | Plamondon, Andréd | Arsenault, A. Bertranda; c | Nadeau, Sylviea; c
Affiliations: [a] Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal (CRIR), Montreal Rehabilitation Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada | [b] Centre for Research in Health Sciences, School of Physical Therapy, Universidade Norte do Parana (UNOPAR), Londrina-PR, Brazil | [c] School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Succursale Centre-Ville, Montreal, Quebec, Canada | [d] Occupational Health and Safety Research Institute Robert-Sauvé, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Note: [] Address for correspondence: Rubens A. da Silva, Ph.D., Centre for Research in Health Sciences, School of Physical Therapy, Universidade Norte do Parana (UNOPAR), 675 Paris Av, Londrina-PR, Brazil, CEP 86041-120. Tel.: +55 (43) 3371 7700, #7990; Fax: +55 (43) 3371 7721; E-mail: rubens@unopar.br/rubensalex@hotmail.com
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of pelvic stabilization and lower-limb configuration on trunk extension strength and to test whether sex modify these effects. Twenty-two healthy volunteers (11 women and 11 men: SEX factor), age range 20–55 years participated in this study. Two isometric maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) were performed in extension and the moment was calculated relative to L5/S1, for each of six experimental conditions. Two different positions were tested (POSITION factor): I) seated position (knees at 90°) and II) semi-sitting position (knees at 45°). In each POSITION, three pelvic stabilization conditions were tested (STABILIZATION factor): (1) unrestrained (control condition), (2) partially restrained (posteriorly) and (3) totally restrained (posteriorly and anteriorly). No significant main effects (p> 0.05) and no double and triple (SEX × STABILIZATION × POSITION) interaction reached statistical significance. Consequently, maximal trunk extension moment can be achieved with the use of various stabilization and positioning modalities, at least when the same apparatus allows such flexibility, and this as much in women as in men subjects. These results have implications for the assessment of trunk extension strength during pre- and post-training regiments during a rehabilitation program for strengthening of back muscles in patients with low back pain.
Keywords: Back muscles, strength, rehabilitation, training, stabilization, position
DOI: 10.3233/IES-2011-0412
Journal: Isokinetics and Exercise Science, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 175-179, 2011
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl