Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Ambegaonkar, Jatin P.a | Shultz, Sandra J.b
Affiliations: [a] Sports Medicine Assessment Research and Testing Laboratory, George Mason University, Manassas, VA, USA | [b] Applied Neuromechanics Research Laboratory, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, USA
Note: [] Address for correspondence: Jatin P. Ambegaonkar, PhD ATC OT CSCS, George Mason University, 208-C, Bull Run Hall, MS 4E5, 10900, University Boulevard, Manassas, VA 20110, USA. Tel.: +1 703 993 2123; Fax: +1 703 993 2025; E-mail: jambegao@gmu.edu
Abstract: Surface electromyography(sEMG) is extensively used to examine muscle activation. Although raw sEMG signals are often filtered using Root-Mean-Square(RMS) algorithms, little agreement exists as to the time window over which signals should be processed. We examined the effects of differing RMS filtering windows on muscle onset times. Fifty-five participants performed 5 drop jumps from a 45 cm box and lateral gastrocnemius(LG), medial and lateral hamstring(MH, LH) and lateral quadriceps(LQ) muscle activity were acquired. Signals were collected at 1000 Hz and RMS filtered using 3 ms, 10 ms, 20 ms and 25 ms windows. Muscle onset times differed by RMS windows for the LG(p= 0.01), MH(p= 0.002), and LH(p= 0.000), but not for the LQ(p=0.14). Pairwise comparisons indicated that LG onsets were earlier with the 3 ms vs. 20 ms window, MH onsets were earlier with the 3 ms vs. 20 ms and 25 ms windows, and LH onsets were earlier with the 3 ms, 10 ms, and 20 ms windows than the 25 ms window. Gastrocnemius and hamstring muscle onset times were substantially earlier when filtering raw sEMG data with 3 ms versus wider RMS windows(> 20 ms) during landing. Changing filtering parameters affects data interpretation when analyzing sEMG data using differing window widths. Additional research should determine optimal RMS window widths that maximize signal fidelity but still retain meaningful time differences.
Keywords: Surface electromyography, root mean square, signal processing, drop jumps
DOI: 10.3233/IES-2010-0370
Journal: Isokinetics and Exercise Science, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 125-132, 2010
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl