Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Williams, C.A.a | Doust, J.H.b | Hammond, A.b
Affiliations: [a] School of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK | [b] Chelsea School, University of Brighton, Brighton, UK
Note: [] Address for correspondence: Dr. C.A. Williams, School of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Exeter, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK. Tel.: +44 1392 264890; Fax: +44 1392 264726; E-mail: c.a.williams@exeter.ac.uk
Abstract: Previous studies of cycling power output have typically been conducted on cycle ergometers, which cannot control the cadence or inertial properties. Therefore, nine female adults (mean age 21.2 ± 0.9 y) each completed five different all out short-term cycle sprint tests. The first test consisted of an isokinetic force-velocity test to determine the optimal pedal cadence (C_{opt}) at which maximum peak power was recorded. C_{opt} was determined by seven sprints of 6 s duration and interspersed by a five minute rest. Power-cadence data produces a known parabola curve whose apex represents C_{opt}. Thereafter, and on separate days and randomly chosen, three isokinetic cycle tests of 30 s duration at three different cadences 90 and 150 rev ·min^{-1}, at optimal cadence (C_{opt}) and a traditional 30 s Wingate test (WAnT) against a pre-set load of 0.09 kg · kg^{-1} body mass were performed. Oxygen uptake throughout the latter four tests was obtained. Measures of maximal power (P_{max}), mean power over 30 s (MP30 s) and � O_2 were recorded. The optimal cadence was 114 ± 6 rev ·min^{-1}. The P_{max} for C_{opt} (694 ± 111 W) was found to be significantly higher compared to 150 rev · min^{-1} and WAnT (555 ± 144 and 629 ± 132 W respectively, p<0.05). For MP30 s the 150 rev ·min^{-1} maximal sprint (251 ± 96 W) was found to be significantly lower compared to the C_{opt} and WAnT (462 ± 76 and 440 ± 80 W respectively, p < 0.05). No significant differences were found for � O_2 between any of the tests (P > 0.05). In conclusion, these results demonstrate the importance of the optimal cadence in maximising the P_{max} score compared to other pre-set cadences.
Keywords: Methodology, cycle ergometry, peak power, females
DOI: 10.3233/IES-2006-0244
Journal: Isokinetics and Exercise Science, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 327-333, 2006
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl