Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Ropponen, Anninaa; b
Affiliations: [a] University of Kuopio, Institute of Biomedicine/Ergonomics, Kuopio, Finland | [b] University of Jyväskylä, Department of Health Sciences, Jyväskylä, Finland
Note: [] Address for correspondence: Annina Ropponen, University of Kuopio, Institute of Biomedicine/Ergonomics, P.O. Box 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland. Tel.: +358 17 163111; Fax: +358 17 163112; E-mail: annina.ropponen@uku.fi
Abstract: Objective: To compare the associations between different physical activity histories and anthropometric measures in isokinetic lifting performance, isometric back extension endurance and psychophysical lifting tests. Background: The relative roles and interaction of these factors related to back function are largely unknown. Methods: The subjects consisted of a population-based sample of 210 working-age males. Paraspinal muscle cross-sectional areas were obtained by magnetic resonance imaging; anthropometric measures, isokinetic and psychophysical lifting capacity, and isometric back extension endurance tests were performed and current and physical activity histories and occupational loading were enquired by structured interview. Stepwise multiple regression analyses were used to study the associations. Results: Lean body weight, body weight and sum of the paraspinal muscle CSAs at L3-L4 level predicted the highest amount of the variance (R^2=10–25%) and the different models of anthropometric measures and physical activity 7–33% of the variance in the back function tests. Conclusions: The models of physical activity and anthropometric measures or their combination predicted isokinetic lifting performances weakly and other back function test results even worse. As a single predictive factor, lean body weight showed weak ability to predict isokinetic lifting performances. Collecting current or past data of physical activity parameters does not add anything for predicting back function.
Keywords: Anthropometrics, body weight, lean body weight, isokinetic lifting force, back function, muscle cross-sectional area, physical activity
DOI: 10.3233/IES-2006-0231
Journal: Isokinetics and Exercise Science, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 241-250, 2006
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl