Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Bardis, C.a | Kalamara, E.a | Loucaides, G.b | Michaelides, M.b | Tsaklis, P.c
Affiliations: [a] Department of Physical Therapy, Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation Centre, Nicosia, Cyprus | [b] Cyprus Sport Research Centre, Cyprus | [c] Technological Educational Institute Thessaloniki, Greece
Note: [] Address for correspondence: Christos Bardis, Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation Centre, 29 Arch. Kyprianou Ave., 2959 Strovolos, Nicosia, Cyprus. Tel.: +357 22 463060, +357 99 316781; Fax: +357 22 463070; E-mail: chrisbardis@in.gr
Abstract: Introduction: There is minimal information in the literature concerning the intramachine reliability of the new Isokinetic dynamometer Con-Trex MJ, and the intermachine reproducibility of this instrument with the Cybex Norm isokinetic dynamometer. Objective: The purpose of this study was to provide some insight with regard to the reproducibility of Con-Trex MJ in measuring the knee muscle performance in flexion and extension (concentric) and to compare the variability of measurement between Con-Trex and Cybex Norm. Methods: 35 (70 legs) male subjects with no previous history of any knee pathology volunteered for the study. Intramachine reproducibility was evaluated by assessing 30 legs twice on the Con-Trex MJ, within 2 to 7 days, at angular velocities of 60°, 180° and 300°/sec. Intermachine reproducibility was evaluated by assessing 40 legs randomly on the Con-Trex MJ and Cybex Norm within 2 to 7 days at 60° and 180°/sec. Coefficient of variation (CV) was used to determine the reproducibility of repeated measurements at $p< 0.01$. Results: Intra: The variability of measurements of Con-Trex for Peak Torque, was 5.19–5.68% for extension and 4.84–7.33% for flexion depending on the angular velocity. This is acceptable for clinical and research studies. Inter: Between the two Isokinetic devices there was a greater CV for Peak Torque ranging 7.28–9.17% for extension and 8.54–15.84% for flexion. Conclusion: Based on the results of the present study, comparisons of results between the two devices may not be valid. The results for knee flexion and extension measurements at 60° and 180°/sec recorded with Con-Trex were consistently greater than the values recorded with the Cybex Norm.
Keywords: intramachine, intermachine, reproducibility, reliability, isokinetic, dynamometer
DOI: 10.3233/IES-2004-0155
Journal: Isokinetics and Exercise Science, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 91-97, 2004
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl