Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Liebermann, Dario G.a | Katz, Larryb
Affiliations: [a] Department of Physical Therapy, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel. Tel.: +972 3 640 5589; Fax: +972 3 640 5436; E-mail: dlieberm@post.tau.ac.il | [b] Sport Technology Research Centre, Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
Note: [] Address for correspondence: Dario G. Liebermann, Ph.D., Department of Physical Therapy, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, P.O.B. 39040, Ramat Aviv, 69978 Israel
Abstract: Purpose: This study assessed the reliability and validity of different methods used to estimate lower-limb muscular power capability based on mechanical variables. For this purpose, vertical jumping was compared with isokinetic knee extensions and with power tests used by practitioners. Methods: Four groups of subjects (N=106) were tested in different conditions. Group-I performed countermovement vertical jumps (CMJ) on a force plate followed by left and right knee extensions on an isokinetic device at 120, 180 and 240 deg · s^{-1}. Group-II performed CMJ trials followed by 20-m sprints, hand-reach jumps and 1RM leg-press testing. Group-III carried out squat jumps (SJ) in addition to CMJ trials. Finally, Group-IV performed the CMJ test and was retested twice after a short inter-session interval (1–4 days) and after a long one (4.5–5 months). The Pearson correlation was used to assess the validity and reliability of CMJ (p ≤ 0.01, **). Results: Mean peak power during CMJ was correlated with sprint time (r=-0.882^{**}) and leg-press 1 RM (r=0.797^{**}), but less with peak hand-reach height (r=0.695; p ≤ 0.05). Isokinetic knee extension power showed also a significant correlation with CMJ power, but its strength depended on the angular velocity (Isok-120 r=0.702^{**}; Isok-180 r=0.737^{**}; Isok-240 r=0.599^{**}). Test-retests showed a strong correlation after a short interval (r=0.915^{**}) and after a long one (r=0.890^{**}). Using the SJ technique did not have any effect on reliability (r=0.914^{**}). Conclusions: CMJ matches other methods used for testing lower-limb power capability. It is highly reliable and it allows a valid assessment of muscular power. Since CMJ is also simple and accurate to perform, it is the recommended method.
DOI: 10.3233/IES-2003-0106
Journal: Isokinetics and Exercise Science, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 87-94, 2003
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl