Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Lexchin, Joela; b; c;
Affiliations: [a] School of Health Policy and Management, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada | [b] University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada | [c] Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Correspondence: [*] Address for correspondence: Joel Lexchin, School of Health Policy and Management, York University, 4700 Keele St., Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada. Tel.: +1 416 209 4885; E-mail: jlexchin@yorku.ca; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5120-8029
Abstract: BACKGROUND:Companies often defending their products when there are concerns about their safety and/or effectiveness. OBJECTIVE:This study looks at drugs removed from the Canadian market from 1990 onward and examines how companies responded. METHODS:This descriptive analysis used a previously published article and a hand search of a Government of Canada website to generate a list of drugs withdrawn from Canada from 1990 onwards. For each product the following information was extracted: brand name, generic name, company, date of withdrawal and evidence base for withdrawal. Google and Factiva searches were used to identify sources containing statements from the company about the withdrawal. Statements were independently graded by two people into the following categories: company agrees with the withdrawal; drug could be used safely with certain precautions; company may reintroduce the drug; company disagrees with the withdrawal. Searches were carried out between September 15–20, 2020. RESULTS:There were 22 drugs for which there were company statements. In 10 statements, the companies disagreed with the decision to withdraw the drug and in 7 they agreed with the decision. In the other 5 cases they felt that the drug could have been kept on the market with restrictions (2 cases) or they might reintroduce the drug (3 cases). The level of evidence for the withdrawal did not seem to influence the companies’ position. CONCLUSION:In 15 out of 22 cases, the company either disagreed with the decision to withdraw the drug or felt that the drug should continue to be available to Canadian patients.
Keywords: Drug withdrawals, Health Canada, level of evidence, pharmaceutical companies
DOI: 10.3233/JRS-210013
Journal: International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 331-341, 2021
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl