Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Pandey, Gaurava; b | Bagri, Rashikac | Gupta, Rajana; d | Rajpal, Ankitc; * | Agarwal, Manoje | Kumar, Naveenc; *
Affiliations: [a] Research and Analytics Division, Analyttica Datalab, Whitefield, Bangalore, Karnataka, India | [b] School of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science, IIT Jodhpur, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India | [c] Department of Computer Science, University of Delhi, Delhi, India | [d] Artificial Intelligence and Innovation Lab, Universidad Autonoma de Tamaulipas, Mexico | [e] Department of Computer Science, Hans Raj College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding authors: Ankit Rajpal, Department of Computer Science, University of Delhi, Delhi, India. E-mail: arajpal@ cs.du.ac.in. Naveen Kumar, Department of Computer Science, University of Delhi, Delhi, India. E-mail: nkumar@cs.du.ac.in.
Abstract: Traditionally, performance measures such as accuracy, recall, precision, specificity, and negative predicted value (NPV) have been used to evaluate a classification model’s performance. However, these measures often fall short of capturing different classification scenarios, such as binary or multi-class, balanced or imbalanced, and noisy or noiseless data. Therefore, there is a need for a robust evaluation metric that can assist business decision-makers in selecting the most suitable model for a given scenario. Recently, a general performance score (GPS) comprising different combinations of traditional performance measures (TPMs) was proposed. However, it indiscriminately assigns equal importance to each measure, often leading to inconsistencies. To overcome the shortcomings of GPS, we introduce an enhanced metric called the Weighted General Performance Score (W-GPS) that considers each measure’s coefficient of variation (CV) and subsequently assigns weights to that measure based on its CV value. Considering consistency as a criterion, we found that W-GPS outperformed GPS in the above-mentioned classification scenarios. Further, considering W-GPS with different weighted combinations of TPMs, it was observed that no demarcation of these combinations that work best in a given scenario exists. Thus, W-GPS offers flexibility to the user to choose the most suitable combination for a given scenario.
Keywords: Performance measures, classification, imbalanced data modelling, noisy data modelling, coefficient of variation
DOI: 10.3233/IDT-240465
Journal: Intelligent Decision Technologies, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 2033-2054, 2024
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl