Searching for just a few words should be enough to get started. If you need to make more complex queries, use the tips below to guide you.
Article type: Research Article
Authors: Balusa, Bhanu Chandera; * | Gorai, Amit Kumarb
Affiliations: [a] School of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, India | [b] Department of Mining Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela, India
Correspondence: [*] Corresponding author: Bhanu Chander Balusa, School of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, India. E-mail: bhanuchanderbalusa@gmail.com.
Abstract: In the last few decades, many underground mining methods were proposed for extractions of ores. The decision-making for selecting the most suitable mining method for a typical ore depost depnds on various intrinsic and extrinsic factors (intrinsic – dip, shape, thickness, depth, grade distribution, RMR (rock mass rating) and RSS (rock substance strength) of ore, hanging wall, footwall, and extrinsic – recovery, dilution, safety, productivity, flexibility, capital). The present study aims to develop a hierarchical Fuzzy-AHP (FAHP) model for choosing the most suitable underground mining method for an ore deposit. The structure of the proposed hierarchical FAHP model consists of five levels. The level-1 of the hierarchy defines two variables (intrinsic factors and extrinsic factors). These are further classified into quantitative or qualitative nature of variable (listed in level-2). The criteria, sub-criteria, and mining method variables are listed respectively in Level 3, Level 4, and Level 5. For each level of the hierarchy, a fuzzy pair-wise comparison matrices are developed using the corresponding levels’ listed variables. These matrices at each level are subsequently used to determine the local and global weights of each variable. The global weights are used for prioritizing the different mining methods. The proposed hierarchical FAHP model was validated by considering the field data of two different ore deposits in India. The results showed that the most appropriate mining method predicted from the decision-making model and the adopted mining method for extracting the ore deposit are same in two case studied mines.
Keywords: Multi-criteria decision making model, hierarchical fuzzy-AHP, underground mining methods
DOI: 10.3233/IDT-200184
Journal: Intelligent Decision Technologies, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 405-420, 2021
IOS Press, Inc.
6751 Tepper Drive
Clifton, VA 20124
USA
Tel: +1 703 830 6300
Fax: +1 703 830 2300
sales@iospress.com
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
IOS Press
Nieuwe Hemweg 6B
1013 BG Amsterdam
The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 688 3355
Fax: +31 20 687 0091
info@iospress.nl
For editorial issues, permissions, book requests, submissions and proceedings, contact the Amsterdam office info@iospress.nl
Inspirees International (China Office)
Ciyunsi Beili 207(CapitaLand), Bld 1, 7-901
100025, Beijing
China
Free service line: 400 661 8717
Fax: +86 10 8446 7947
china@iospress.cn
For editorial issues, like the status of your submitted paper or proposals, write to editorial@iospress.nl
如果您在出版方面需要帮助或有任何建, 件至: editorial@iospress.nl